Olympus E-410 vs Sony T900
77 Imaging
43 Features
35 Overall
39
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Olympus E-410 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Launched June 2007
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-410
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-400
- Updated by Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed February 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-410 vs Sony T900 Overview
Following is a extensive review of the Olympus E-410 vs Sony T900, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-410 (10MP) and the T900 (12MP) is very comparable but the E-410 (Four Thirds) and T900 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-410 was unveiled 20 months prior to the T900 making the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-410 scores versus the T900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-410 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-410 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-410 Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Sony T900
| E-410 | T900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus E-410
| T900 | E-410 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2009 | June 2007 | More modern by 20 months | |
| Display sizing | 3.5" | 2.5" | Larger display (+1") | |
| Display resolution | 922k | 215k | Crisper display (+707k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-410 and Sony T900
| E-410 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-410 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-410 enjoys outer measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Sony T900 has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-410 vs Sony T900 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the E-410 versus the T900.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-410 and T900 is 77 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-410 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes only by going through a spec sheet. The pic underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-410 and T900.
As you can see, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-410 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Sony T900 will produce more detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged E-410 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-410 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-410 vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Olympus E-410 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus E-410 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Also called as | EVOLT E-410 | - |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2007-06-14 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 215k dot | 922k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 2s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 435 grams (0.96 pounds) | 143 grams (0.32 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 51 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.1 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.0 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 494 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | - | $300 |