Olympus E-420 vs Olympus E-M1 II
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed June 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-420 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
Following is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus E-420 versus Olympus E-M1 II, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Pro Mirrorless and both of them are produced by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and E-M1 II (20MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizing (Four Thirds).
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-420 was introduced 9 years prior to the E-M1 II which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-420 matches up against the E-M1 II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-420 vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-420 and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-420 Gallery and Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Olympus E-M1 II
| E-420 | E-M1 II |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus E-420
| E-M1 II | E-420 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2016 |  | June 2008 | More modern by 100 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1037k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Olympus E-M1 II
| E-420 | E-M1 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus |
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-420 offers exterior dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M1 II has measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-420 versus Olympus E-M1 II in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the E-420 and the E-M1 II.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-420 and E-M1 II is 77 and 68 respectively.
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes only by going through a spec sheet. The picture below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-420 and E-M1 II.
Clearly, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should anticipate the Olympus E-M1 II to produce extra detail using its extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged E-420 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
| Olympus E-420 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus E-420 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Pro Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2008-06-23 | 2016-09-19 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 60.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | 1/250 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 4096x2160 |
| Video data format | - | MOV, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 426 grams (0.94 lbs) | 574 grams (1.27 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 56 | 80 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 12.8 |
| DXO Low light rating | 527 | 1312 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | 350 pictures |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | BLH-1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
| Card slots | Single | Dual |
| Pricing at release | $999 | $1,700 |