Clicky

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus E-M1 II

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
36
Overall
40
Olympus E-420 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs

Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Revealed June 2008
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-410
Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Released September 2016
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M1
  • Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview

Following is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus E-420 versus Olympus E-M1 II, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Pro Mirrorless and both of them are produced by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and E-M1 II (20MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizing (Four Thirds).

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-420 was introduced 9 years prior to the E-M1 II which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-420 matches up against the E-M1 II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 E-420 E-M1 II 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus E-420

 E-M1 II E-420 
ReleasedSeptember 2016June 2008More modern by 100 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1037k230kClearer display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Olympus E-M1 II

 E-420 E-M1 II 
Manual focus Dial accurate focus

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-420 offers exterior dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M1 II has measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-420 versus Olympus E-M1 II in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the E-420 and the E-M1 II.

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus E-M1 II size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-420 and E-M1 II is 77 and 68 respectively.

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus E-M1 II top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes only by going through a spec sheet. The picture below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-420 and E-M1 II.

Clearly, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should anticipate the Olympus E-M1 II to produce extra detail using its extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged E-420 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus E-M1 II sensor size comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-420 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-M1 II as a Portrait photography camera
56
focusing manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
MP count low (10 megapixels)
75
focusing manually
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-420 Street photography advice
Olympus E-M1 II Street photography advice
64
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (426 grams)
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
78
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
supports touch to focus
weather sealing
lighter than competition (574 grams)
great ISO range (25,600)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-420 Sports photography factors
Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography factors
38
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect auto focus
slow continuous shooting (4.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
terrible battery pack (500 per charge)
74
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
silent shutter (1/32,000s)
high frames per second (60.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
weather sealing
supports phase detect auto focus
not so great battery life (350 shots)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-420 Travel photography highlights
Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography highlights
52
lighter than competition in class (426g)
built-in flash
no Timelapse recording
terrible battery pack (500 CIPA)
MP count low (10MP)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
72
lighter than competition (574 grams)
weather sealing
supports touch to focus
MP count decent (20MP)
screen is selfie friendly
not so great battery life (350 shots)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-420
Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1 II
47
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
terrible battery pack (500 CIPA)
no Timelapse recording
76
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
doesnt have low pass filter
great ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
weather sealing
2 card slots
not so great battery life (350 CIPA)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-420 Vlogging info
Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging info
9
no video recording
79
screen is selfie friendly
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detection focus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pixels)
comes with external mic support
lighter than competition (574 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-420 and Olympus E-M1 II
 Olympus E-420Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-420 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
Class Entry-Level DSLR Pro Mirrorless
Revealed 2008-06-23 2016-09-19
Physical type Compact SLR SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III TruePic VIII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 5184 x 3888
Maximum native ISO 1600 25600
Min native ISO 100 200
RAW pictures
Min enhanced ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 3 121
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Amount of lenses 45 107
Crop factor 2.1 2.1
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 1,037 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage 95% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x 0.74x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/8000 secs
Fastest silent shutter speed - 1/32000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 4.0 frames per sec 60.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 9.10 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180 secs 1/250 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Maximum video resolution None 4096x2160
Video data format - MOV, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 426 grams (0.94 lbs) 574 grams (1.27 lbs)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 56 80
DXO Color Depth rating 21.5 23.7
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 12.8
DXO Low light rating 527 1312
Other
Battery life 500 pictures 350 pictures
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID - BLH-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots
Card slots Single Dual
Pricing at release $999 $1,700