Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0caf0/0caf02c15539c36b2fb3f81379859b5c5d17f544" alt="Olympus E-420 front Olympus E-420 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86e58/86e58dbdc1df53889f3e4aef4918a9ae36fe6ab0" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ front Olympus SP-800 UZ front"
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced June 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Bump to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Newer Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Olympus E-420 and Olympus SP-800 UZ, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-420 was manufactured 19 months prior to the SP-800 UZ which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-420 scores versus the SP-800 UZ in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-420 & Olympus SP-800 UZ. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
E-420 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Olympus E-420
SP-800 UZ | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2010 | ![]() | June 2008 | Newer by 19 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
E-420 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-420 has got physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-800 UZ has proportions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-420 and Olympus SP-800 UZ in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the E-420 compared to the SP-800 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/490ed/490ed6d456bc4d81d988ec3860ee80366c6b85cd" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-420 and SP-800 UZ is 77 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea393/ea393321ea1d0784c059b1be7aef4f70297fc93d" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions only by checking out a spec sheet. The image below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-420 and SP-800 UZ.
Clearly, the two cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-420 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus SP-800 UZ will show greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged E-420 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8725/d8725bda1192125d3d18b6638efda20ecab26410" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ae05/2ae059d2f716684490bbdb7fbe947edb3dc1f4ab" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-420 | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2008-06-23 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 1000 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 12 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426g (0.94 pounds) | 455g (1.00 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $999 | $270 |