Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0caf0/0caf02c15539c36b2fb3f81379859b5c5d17f544" alt="Olympus E-420 front Olympus E-420 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7e21/a7e2113adb5f22cfd856c9b9ebf2ca5403c26cd4" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS front Olympus SZ-16 iHS front"
89 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced June 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Revealed January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are offered by Olympus. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and SZ-16 iHS (16MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and SZ-16 iHS (1/2.3") come with different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-420 was introduced 5 years before the SZ-16 iHS which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus SZ-16 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-420 grades against the SZ-16 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-420 & Olympus SZ-16 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
E-420 | SZ-16 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Olympus E-420
SZ-16 iHS | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | June 2008 | More modern by 55 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Olympus SZ-16 iHS
E-420 | SZ-16 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-420 comes with physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Olympus SZ-16 iHS has proportions of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-420 and the SZ-16 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d96dd/d96ddac9b33c56c9ec4271146401a6192605656e" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-420 and SZ-16 iHS is 77 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69bb9/69bb9d8a7fd178e61b9aada63c8743bfa892bb44" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes just by viewing specs. The pic here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-420 and SZ-16 iHS.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-420 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus SZ-16 iHS will result in extra detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-420 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c2e5/6c2e532d6b348e73ff7a352fd4f7adc54ec05830" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29a89/29a891b4921d5eb3b2d28e9c1a36d33e9680d169" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-420 | Olympus SZ-16 iHS |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2008-06-23 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 426 grams (0.94 lb) | 226 grams (0.50 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | 220 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $999 | $230 |