Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 6020
77 Imaging
45 Features
36 Overall
41
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced June 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 6020
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 6020 Overview
The following is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 6020, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and 6020 (13MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and 6020 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-420 was manufactured 19 months earlier than the 6020 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-420 scores vs the 6020 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-420 & Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Olympus 6020
| E-420 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Olympus E-420
| 6020 | E-420 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2010 |  | June 2008 | Newer by 19 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Olympus 6020
| E-420 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical screen measurement |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-420 provides outer measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Olympus 6020 has specifications of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 6020 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-420 compared to the 6020.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-420 and 6020 is 77 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading specifications. The image below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-420 and 6020.
To sum up, the 2 cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-420 because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus 6020 will offer you more detail due to its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-420 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
| Olympus E-420 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus E-420 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
| Also called | - | mju Tough 6020 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2008-06-23 | 2010-02-02 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 426 grams (0.94 pounds) | 122 grams (0.27 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 527 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $999 | $279 |
