Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 8010
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 8010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Launched June 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 8010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 8010 Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 8010, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and 8010 (13MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and 8010 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-420 was released 19 months before the 8010 making the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-420 scores against the 8010 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 8010 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-420 & Olympus Stylus Tough 8010. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Olympus 8010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Olympus 8010
| E-420 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Olympus E-420
| 8010 | E-420 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2010 |  | June 2008 | More modern by 19 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Olympus 8010
| E-420 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent display size |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 8010 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-420 comes with outer measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Olympus 8010 has specifications of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 8010 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view scale comparison of the E-420 versus the 8010.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-420 and 8010 is 77 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 8010 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading specifications. The pic here might give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-420 and 8010.
To sum up, each of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-420 featuring a larger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Olympus 8010 will offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged E-420 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 8010 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 8010 Specifications
| Olympus E-420 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus E-420 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 |
| Alternate name | - | mju Tough 8010 |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2008-06-23 | 2010-02-02 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 426 grams (0.94 pounds) | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 527 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $999 | $600 |