Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-310
77 Imaging
45 Features
36 Overall
41
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released June 2008
- Older Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
In this article, we will be looking at the Olympus E-420 and Olympus TG-310, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof and both are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and TG-310 (14MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and TG-310 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-420 was launched 3 years before the TG-310 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-420 matches up versus the TG-310 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-420 and Olympus TG-310. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-420 Gallery and Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Olympus TG-310
| E-420 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus E-420
| TG-310 | E-420 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | June 2008 | Newer by 30 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Olympus TG-310
| E-420 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent screen size |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-420 offers external measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Olympus TG-310 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Olympus E-420 and Olympus TG-310 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-420 versus the TG-310.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-420 and TG-310 is 77 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions just by going through technical specs. The pic below should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-420 and TG-310.
As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-420 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus TG-310 will show more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged E-420 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Olympus E-420 | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus E-420 | Olympus TG-310 |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
| Released | 2008-06-23 | 2011-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 426 grams (0.94 lb) | 155 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 527 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | 150 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $999 | $0 |
