Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-810
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0caf0/0caf02c15539c36b2fb3f81379859b5c5d17f544" alt="Olympus E-420 front Olympus E-420 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33564/33564fa180a03f0ad37d4e2877201fb0d473cbdb" alt="Olympus TG-810 front Olympus TG-810 front"
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-810 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed June 2008
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched August 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-810 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus E-420 and Olympus TG-810, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and they are both built by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and TG-810 (14MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and TG-810 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-420 was released 4 years earlier than the TG-810 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-810 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-420 grades against the TG-810 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-810 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-420 & Olympus TG-810. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Olympus TG-810 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Olympus TG-810
E-420 | TG-810 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Olympus E-420
TG-810 | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2011 | ![]() | June 2008 | More recent by 38 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Olympus TG-810
E-420 | TG-810 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-810 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-420 features external measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Olympus TG-810 has specifications of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-420 and Olympus TG-810 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-420 vs the TG-810.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b9b9/1b9b9f533849bb6215b807b9ebdda022d2b1b34c" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-810 size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-810 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-420 and TG-810 is 77 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a28a/6a28af07005ce1895c6edec4468798c2a8dc510e" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-810 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-810 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-810 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements simply by looking at technical specs. The visual here may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-420 and TG-810.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-420 because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus TG-810 will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The older E-420 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4704a/4704ac60573f798d5ec838ad3146f0dbc28c84da" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-810 sensor size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-810 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e88c/2e88c578bcd965e541dc4b36d8423d47f3e1b140" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-810 Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Olympus TG-810 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-420 | Olympus TG-810 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2008-06-23 | 2011-08-16 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 426g (0.94 lbs) | 215g (0.47 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | 220 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $999 | $428 |