Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-3
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0caf0/0caf02c15539c36b2fb3f81379859b5c5d17f544" alt="Olympus E-420 front Olympus E-420 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c62ad/c62adda3df33c555b7142020fb576a7ad037cf6b" alt="Olympus Tough TG-3 front Olympus Tough TG-3 front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced June 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced March 2014
- New Model is Olympus TG-4
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
Here is a thorough comparison of the Olympus E-420 versus Olympus TG-3, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and both are designed by Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and TG-3 (16MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and TG-3 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-420 was revealed 6 years earlier than the TG-3 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-420 scores vs the TG-3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-420 & Olympus Tough TG-3. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Olympus TG-3
E-420 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Olympus E-420
TG-3 | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2014 | ![]() | June 2008 | Fresher by 70 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Olympus TG-3
E-420 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-420 has got external measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-3 has specifications of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-420 versus Olympus TG-3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-420 versus the TG-3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a802a/a802a91c1f2281b6f101125dd78aa3093ed95893" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-3 size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-3 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-420 and TG-3 is 77 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74dfd/74dfd6a203e445704ec6d359565401f0a9222d2a" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizing just by checking technical specs. The graphic here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-420 and TG-3.
As you can tell, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-420 with its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus TG-3 will give greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos far more aggressively. The older E-420 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3abea/3abea84aa6e5c694514644921eda2dc846acdd26" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a068/5a0686da69f5ae928a811419a00f19b118b01866" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-420 | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2008-06-23 | 2014-03-31 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT-LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426g (0.94 lbs) | 247g (0.54 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | 330 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $999 | $350 |