Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-4
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0caf0/0caf02c15539c36b2fb3f81379859b5c5d17f544" alt="Olympus E-420 front Olympus E-420 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07841/0784163336d0cb666d56989c0f306f52fdaab95d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-4 front Olympus Tough TG-4 front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced June 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Launched April 2015
- Superseded the Olympus TG-3
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-4, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both built by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and TG-4 (16MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and TG-4 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-420 was manufactured 7 years prior to the TG-4 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-420 scores versus the TG-4 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-420 & Olympus Tough TG-4. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Olympus TG-4
E-420 | TG-4 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus E-420
TG-4 | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2015 | ![]() | June 2008 | Newer by 82 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Olympus TG-4
E-420 | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-420 has outside dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Olympus TG-4 has dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-4 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is the front view size comparison of the E-420 compared to the TG-4.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc50c/dc50ca99835cde6e642b369fd929d9240b138bf6" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-420 and TG-4 is 77 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac061/ac0612ceab412b91c357adcb8fd6f0f85fdc75b5" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions just by checking specs. The pic here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-420 and TG-4.
All in all, both cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-420 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus TG-4 will give more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged E-420 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4b3a/e4b3aa26855da3483cadfc42a7a800872d66a18a" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fcbd5/fcbd5df2d1ee7f72d93cacdf41e5c48b28e7e993" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-420 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Announced | 2008-06-23 | 2015-04-13 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426g (0.94 lbs) | 247g (0.54 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | 380 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $999 | $379 |