Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-120
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0caf0/0caf02c15539c36b2fb3f81379859b5c5d17f544" alt="Olympus E-420 front Olympus E-420 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d8a9/2d8a95487a0964a4254d1d693e044bf6a741f7bd" alt="Olympus VG-120 front Olympus VG-120 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-120 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced June 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-120 Overview
Following is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus E-420 and Olympus VG-120, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and VG-120 (14MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and VG-120 (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-420 was brought out 3 years prior to the VG-120 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus VG-120 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the E-420 grades against the VG-120 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-120 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-420 & Olympus VG-120. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Olympus VG-120 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Olympus VG-120
E-420 | VG-120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Olympus E-420
VG-120 | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | ![]() | June 2008 | More modern by 30 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Olympus VG-120
E-420 | VG-120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-120 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-420 has got outside measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Olympus VG-120 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
See the Olympus E-420 and Olympus VG-120 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-420 against the VG-120.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8854/b88541e91e5a84010aebf904fd0ae5e3d3466cca" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-120 size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-120 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-420 and VG-120 is 77 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c01e1/c01e1938504f53163f7c1f9456bb32796ab749ff" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-120 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-120 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-120 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes just by reading through technical specs. The picture here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-420 and VG-120.
As you have seen, the two cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-420 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus VG-120 will give more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-420 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a52e/9a52ecec9bcf627dec1402de4125d7aabe7e50a9" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-120 sensor size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-120 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09a8b/09a8b97892a6b877fabafe68f13e8daa705287b9" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-120 Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Olympus VG-120 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-420 | Olympus VG-120 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2008-06-23 | 2011-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 7cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426 grams (0.94 lb) | 120 grams (0.26 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 160 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $999 | $190 |