Clicky

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-145

Portability
77
Imaging
45
Features
36
Overall
41
Olympus E-420 front
 
Olympus VG-145 front
Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
24
Overall
31

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-145 Key Specs

Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Launched June 2008
  • Replaced the Olympus E-410
Olympus VG-145
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Introduced July 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-145 Overview

Following is a extensive comparison of the Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-145, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact and both are offered by Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and VG-145 (14MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and VG-145 (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-420 was launched 4 years before the VG-145 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-420 grades against the VG-145 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Olympus VG-145

 E-420 VG-145 
Manual focus Very precise focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Olympus E-420

 VG-145 E-420 
IntroducedJuly 2011June 2008More modern by 37 months
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Olympus VG-145

 E-420 VG-145 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Missing Touch display

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-145 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-420 has got physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-145 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-145 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the E-420 and the VG-145.

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-145 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-420 and VG-145 is 77 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-145 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-145 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes only by reading specifications. The pic underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-420 and VG-145.

To sum up, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-420 because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus VG-145 will offer more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged E-420 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-145 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-420 Portrait photography factors
Olympus VG-145 Portrait photography factors
57
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
MP count low (10 megapixels)
33
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
has face detection focus
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-420 Street photography features
Olympus VG-145 Street photography features
64
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
lighter than others (426g)
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
48
fixed screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-420 Sports photography factors
Olympus VG-145 Sports photography factors
39
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
not so great battery pack (500 CIPA)
26
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
not so great battery (160 per charge)
does not have phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-420 Travel photography details
Olympus VG-145 Travel photography details
53
lighter than others (426 grams)
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
not so great battery pack (500 shots)
MP count low (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
62
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (26mm)
does not have Timelapse function
not so great battery (160 shots)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-420 Landscape photography details
Olympus VG-145 Landscape photography details
47
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
small screen (2.7")
no image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
not so great battery pack (500 shots)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
36
pretty wide (26mm)
decent sized screen (3")
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
no manual exposure
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
not so great battery (160 shots)
does not have Timelapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-420 Vlogging factors
Olympus VG-145 Vlogging factors
9
no video
28
pretty wide (26mm)
has face detection focus
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external microphone jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-145 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-420 and Olympus VG-145
 Olympus E-420Olympus VG-145
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-420 Olympus VG-145
Type Entry-Level DSLR Ultracompact
Launched 2008-06-23 2011-07-27
Body design Compact SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 3 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.8-6.5
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 4.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.40 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 426 grams (0.94 lb) 120 grams (0.26 lb)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 527 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photos 160 photos
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID - LI-70B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $999 $0