Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-145
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-145 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Launched June 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced July 2011
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-145 Overview
Following is a extensive comparison of the Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-145, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact and both are offered by Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and VG-145 (14MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and VG-145 (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-420 was launched 4 years before the VG-145 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-420 grades against the VG-145 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-145 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-420 & Olympus VG-145. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Olympus VG-145 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Olympus VG-145
E-420 | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Olympus E-420
VG-145 | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2011 | June 2008 | More modern by 37 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Olympus VG-145
E-420 | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-145 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-420 has got physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-145 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-145 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the E-420 and the VG-145.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-420 and VG-145 is 77 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-145 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes only by reading specifications. The pic underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-420 and VG-145.
To sum up, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-420 because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus VG-145 will offer more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged E-420 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-145 Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Olympus VG-145 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-420 | Olympus VG-145 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2008-06-23 | 2011-07-27 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 426 grams (0.94 lb) | 120 grams (0.26 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | 160 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $999 | $0 |