Clicky

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-160

Portability
77
Imaging
45
Features
36
Overall
41
Olympus E-420 front
 
Olympus VG-160 front
Portability
96
Imaging
38
Features
26
Overall
33

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs

Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Revealed June 2008
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-410
Olympus VG-160
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview

Below, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-420 and Olympus VG-160, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are built by Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and VG-160 (14MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and VG-160 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

The E-420 was launched 4 years before the VG-160 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera.

Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-420 scores against the VG-160 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Olympus VG-160

 E-420 VG-160 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus E-420

 VG-160 E-420 
LaunchedJanuary 2012June 2008Fresher by 43 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Olympus VG-160

 E-420 VG-160 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry your camera often, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-420 provides exterior dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Olympus VG-160 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-420 and Olympus VG-160 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-420 compared to the VG-160.

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-420 and VG-160 is 77 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing only by reading through specs. The photograph underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-420 and VG-160.

All in all, both of those cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-420 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus VG-160 will give you greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The older E-420 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-420 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus VG-160 as a Portrait photography camera
57
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
low MP (10 megapixels)
34
MP count decent (14MP)
supports face detect focus
manual focus not available
no manual control
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-420 Street photography details
Olympus VG-160 Street photography details
64
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competitors in class (426 grams)
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
56
lighter than average (125 grams)
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-420 Sports photography highlights
Olympus VG-160 Sports photography highlights
39
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
terrible battery life (500 shots)
27
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
terrible battery (165 shots)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-420 Travel photography features
Olympus VG-160 Travel photography features
53
lighter than competitors in class (426g)
flash built-in
no Timelapse recording
terrible battery life (500 shots)
low MP (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
66
lighter than average (125 grams)
MP count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (26mm)
does not have Timelapse function
terrible battery (165 per charge)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-420 Landscape photography advice
Olympus VG-160 Landscape photography advice
47
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
no image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
terrible battery life (500 shots)
no Timelapse recording
37
rather wide (26mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
terrible battery (165 shots)
does not have Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-420
Vlogging with Olympus VG-160
9
can't record video
30
rather wide (26mm)
supports face detect focus
lighter than average (125g)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have microphone socket
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-420 and Olympus VG-160
 Olympus E-420Olympus VG-160
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-420 Olympus VG-160
Class Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2008-06-23 2012-01-10
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 3 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.8-6.5
Macro focusing range - 7cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 4.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.80 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 426g (0.94 lbs) 125g (0.28 lbs)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 527 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 images 165 images
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID - LI-70B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $999 $90