Clicky

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
77
Imaging
45
Features
36
Overall
41
Olympus E-420 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Launched June 2008
  • Old Model is Olympus E-410
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced July 2011
  • Newer Model is Olympus VR-330
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-420 versus Olympus VR-320, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are sold by Olympus. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and VR-320 (14MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and VR-320 (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-420 was unveiled 4 years earlier than the VR-320 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.

Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-420 grades vs the VR-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Olympus VR-320

 E-420 VR-320 
Manual focus Dial precise focus

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus E-420

 VR-320 E-420 
IntroducedJuly 2011June 2008Fresher by 37 months
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Olympus VR-320

 E-420 VR-320 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kIdentical display resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-420 has got outside dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-420 versus Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-420 and the VR-320.

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-420 and VR-320 is 77 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizing only by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-420 and VR-320.

As you can see, each of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-420 with its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus VR-320 will give greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The older E-420 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-420 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography highlights
57
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
33
good resolution (14 megapixels)
has face detect focus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-420
Street photography with Olympus VR-320
64
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (426 grams)
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (158g)
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-420 Sports photography information
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography information
39
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
max frames per second very slow (4.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
bad battery power (500 per charge)
47
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14MP)
has tracking focus
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-420
Travel photography with Olympus VR-320
53
lighter than competition in class (426g)
flash built-in
missing Timelapse mode
bad battery power (500 per charge)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
70
lighter than average in class (158g)
good resolution (14MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-420 Landscape photography factors
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography factors
47
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is small (2.7 inch)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
bad battery power (500 per charge)
missing Timelapse mode
42
quite wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
does not have Time Lapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-420 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Vlogging camera
9
can't shoot video
32
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focus
lighter than average in class (158g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have mic jack
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-420 and Olympus VR-320
 Olympus E-420Olympus VR-320
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-420 Olympus VR-320
Type Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2008-06-23 2011-07-19
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus range - 1cm
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 4.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.70 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 426 grams (0.94 lb) 158 grams (0.35 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 527 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photographs -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model - LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $999 $179