Clicky

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus XZ-1

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
36
Overall
40
Olympus E-420 front
 
Olympus XZ-1 front
Portability
88
Imaging
35
Features
51
Overall
41

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs

Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Launched June 2008
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-410
Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Announced January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview

The following is a comprehensive review of the Olympus E-420 versus Olympus XZ-1, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are offered by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-420 (10MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is very well matched but the E-420 (Four Thirds) and XZ-1 (1/1.63") enjoy different sensor size.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-420 was released 3 years prior to the XZ-1 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-420 matches up against the XZ-1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Olympus XZ-1

 E-420 XZ-1 

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus E-420

 XZ-1 E-420 
AnnouncedJanuary 2011June 2008Newer by 31 months
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution614k230kClearer display (+384k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Olympus XZ-1

 E-420 XZ-1 
Manual focus Very precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch display Neither includes Touch display

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to travel with your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-420 features exterior measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-1 has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-420 versus Olympus XZ-1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the E-420 versus the XZ-1.

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-420 and XZ-1 is 77 and 88 respectively.

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be tough to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions merely by looking at specifications. The picture here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-420 and XZ-1.

Plainly, both of those cameras have got the exact same megapixel count but different sensor dimensions. The E-420 offers the larger sensor which is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult. The more aged E-420 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-420 Portrait photography details
Olympus XZ-1 Portrait photography details
56
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
low MP (10 megapixels)
45
you can focus manually
offers face detect focus
exports RAW formats
low resolution sensor (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/1.63")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-420 Street photography details
Olympus XZ-1 Street photography details
64
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
lighter than competition in class (426 grams)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/1.63")
heavier than competition in class (275 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-420 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus XZ-1 as a Sports photography camera
38
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
max fps very slow (4.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
terrible battery (500 per charge)
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking focus
great battery power (320 per charge)
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
low resolution sensor (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/1.63")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-420 Travel photography features
Olympus XZ-1 Travel photography features
52
lighter than competition in class (426g)
has built in flash
does not have Time Lapse recording
terrible battery (500 shots)
low MP (10 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
62
great battery power (320 CIPA)
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (275 grams)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-420 Landscape photography advice
Olympus XZ-1 Landscape photography advice
47
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
terrible battery (500 shots)
does not have Time Lapse recording
54
you can focus manually
pretty wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
great battery power (320 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
low resolution sensor (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/1.63")
missing Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-420 Vlogging advice
Olympus XZ-1 Vlogging advice
9
lack of video recording
31
pretty wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focus
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic jack
heavier than competition in class (275 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-420 and Olympus XZ-1
 Olympus E-420Olympus XZ-1
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-420 Olympus XZ-1
Type Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2008-06-23 2011-01-26
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III TruePic V
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.63"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 8.07 x 5.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 44.9mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 3664 x 2752
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 3 11
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-112mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture - f/1.8-2.5
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 4.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 614 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology - OLED
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 4.0 frames per second 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 426 grams (0.94 lb) 275 grams (0.61 lb)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 56 34
DXO Color Depth rating 21.5 18.8
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 10.4
DXO Low light rating 527 117
Other
Battery life 500 shots 320 shots
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID - Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $999 $567