Olympus E-420 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0caf0/0caf02c15539c36b2fb3f81379859b5c5d17f544" alt="Olympus E-420 front Olympus E-420 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced June 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Olympus E-420 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both built by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-420 (10MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is fairly comparable but the E-420 (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") use totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-420 was manufactured 5 years prior to the XZ-2 iHS which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-420 matches up vs the XZ-2 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-420 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-420 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-420
XZ-2 iHS | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | ![]() | June 2008 | Newer by 54 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-420 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera often, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-420 has got external dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-420 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the E-420 against the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea389/ea3892d05a6f5c920f49c67efe61222dc16f5b54" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-420 and XZ-2 iHS is 77 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8bdf6/8bdf6524c34fcbd1ca9b437ed718348e8c3b076e" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions simply by going through specifications. The pic here will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-420 and XZ-2 iHS.
To sum up, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-420 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will produce more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged E-420 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/207dc/207dcc9bc23479adcbbf83115edf36e15c0e187f" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ac13/6ac132585c513f2333128406eb2b9331c030a364" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-420 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2008-06-23 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426 grams (0.94 lb) | 346 grams (0.76 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | 527 | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | 340 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $999 | $450 |