Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FS25
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
95 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed June 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 148g - 97 x 58 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FS25 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Olympus E-420 versus Panasonic FS25, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-420 (10MP) and the FS25 (12MP) is fairly close but the E-420 (Four Thirds) and FS25 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe E-420 was manufactured 7 months prior to the FS25 and they are of a similar age. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FS25 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-420 grades against the FS25 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FS25 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-420 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Panasonic FS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Panasonic FS25
E-420 | FS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS25 over the Olympus E-420
FS25 | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2009 | June 2008 | More modern by 7 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Panasonic FS25
E-420 | FS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FS25 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-420 enjoys outer dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS25 has measurements of 97mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-420 versus Panasonic FS25 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the E-420 compared to the FS25.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-420 and FS25 is 77 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FS25 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to see the gap in sensor sizes just by researching technical specs. The pic here may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-420 and FS25.
As you have seen, both of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-420 because of its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Panasonic FS25 will render greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged E-420 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FS25 Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-420 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2008-06-23 | 2009-01-27 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 29-145mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 426 gr (0.94 lb) | 148 gr (0.33 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 97 x 58 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $999 | $230 |