Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FX75
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0caf0/0caf02c15539c36b2fb3f81379859b5c5d17f544" alt="Olympus E-420 front Olympus E-420 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a220c/a220c2e13d4b7304cd494deb3786cbaa31bcfeb7" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed June 2008
- Previous Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Launched June 2010
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FX70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Following is a in-depth review of the Olympus E-420 and Panasonic FX75, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and FX75 (14MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and FX75 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-420 was brought out 23 months earlier than the FX75 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FX75 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-420 grades against the FX75 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-420 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-420 Gallery and Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Panasonic FX75
E-420 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus E-420
FX75 | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2010 | ![]() | June 2008 | More modern by 23 months |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Panasonic FX75
E-420 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equal screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-420 offers outer dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX75 has specifications of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-420 and Panasonic FX75 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-420 and the FX75.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfc31/cfc31bfb2a35ee3f50cbf940bed594a8ba9b9627" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-420 and FX75 is 77 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/501db/501dbf822117acc6a7b64c12171cf1fa9807353c" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes simply by checking out a spec sheet. The image here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-420 and FX75.
Clearly, both cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-420 featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic FX75 will provide extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-420 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3db82/3db8236cc799823d307f0081a86bf6d1b026990c" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6b95/c6b9593cd3731c2b019c509358e4c261eb0831c5" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-420 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2008-06-23 | 2010-06-01 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.2-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 7.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426g (0.94 lb) | 165g (0.36 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $999 | $139 |