Clicky

Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ200

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
36
Overall
40
Olympus E-420 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front
Portability
65
Imaging
36
Features
64
Overall
47

Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs

Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Launched June 2008
  • Superseded the Olympus E-410
Panasonic FZ200
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
  • 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
  • Launched July 2012
  • Older Model is Panasonic FZ100
  • Updated by Panasonic FZ300
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview

Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus E-420 and Panasonic FZ200, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-420 (10MP) and the FZ200 (12MP) is fairly similar but the E-420 (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizing.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-420 was revealed 5 years earlier than the FZ200 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving into a full comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-420 grades against the FZ200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Panasonic FZ200

 E-420 FZ200 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-420

 FZ200 E-420 
LaunchedJuly 2012June 2008Fresher by 49 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Panasonic FZ200

 E-420 FZ200 
Focus manually Very precise focus
Touch display Absent Touch display

Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-420 provides outside measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ200 has proportions of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-420 and Panasonic FZ200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the E-420 compared to the FZ200.

Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-420 and FZ200 is 77 and 65 respectively.

Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing only by reviewing specifications. The visual underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-420 and FZ200.

Plainly, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-420 using its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Panasonic FZ200 will offer extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older E-420 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-420 Portrait photography factors
Panasonic FZ200 Portrait photography factors
56
you can focus manually
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
MP count low (10MP)
48
manual focus
high flash sync (1/4,000 seconds)
provides face detection focusing
saves RAW files
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-420 Street photography details
Panasonic FZ200 Street photography details
64
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (426 grams)
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
57
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
more heavy than others in class (588 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-420
Sports photography with Panasonic FZ200
38
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
low battery power (500 per charge)
46
excellent zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides tracking autofocus
better than average battery (540 CIPA)
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-420 Travel photography advice
Panasonic FZ200 Travel photography advice
52
lighter than competition in class (426 grams)
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse mode
low battery power (500 shots)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
55
better than average battery (540 per charge)
has built in flash
display is selfie friendly
rather wide (25mm)
great zoom (600mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than others in class (588 grams)
low MP (12MP)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-420 Landscape photography highlights
Panasonic FZ200 Landscape photography highlights
47
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
low battery power (500 shots)
lack of Time Lapse mode
48
manual focus
rather wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
better than average battery (540 shots)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-420
Vlogging with Panasonic FZ200
9
lack of video recording
63
rather wide (25mm)
display is selfie friendly
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focusing
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does have external microphone support
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
more heavy than others in class (588 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-420 and Panasonic FZ200
 Olympus E-420Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-420 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
Class Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2008-06-23 2012-07-18
Physical type Compact SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III Venus Engine VII FHD
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Max boosted ISO - 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 3 23
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8
Macro focus range - 1cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech - Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,312 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage 95% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 4.0fps 12.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 13.50 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 secs 1/4000 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 426 gr (0.94 lb) 588 gr (1.30 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 56 37
DXO Color Depth score 21.5 19.1
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 10.8
DXO Low light score 527 114
Other
Battery life 500 pictures 540 pictures
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch price $999 $499