Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ2500
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
53 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced June 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Announced September 2016
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Succeeded the Panasonic FZ1000
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
Here is a in-depth overview of the Olympus E-420 versus Panasonic FZ2500, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and FZ2500 (1") provide totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-420 was launched 9 years before the FZ2500 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the E-420 scores against the FZ2500 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-420 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Panasonic FZ2500
E-420 | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus E-420
FZ2500 | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | June 2008 | Fresher by 100 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Panasonic FZ2500
E-420 | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing |
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-420 provides outside dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ2500 has proportions of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") with a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-420 versus Panasonic FZ2500 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-420 compared to the FZ2500.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-420 and FZ2500 is 77 and 53 respectively.
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing just by going over specs. The photograph here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-420 and FZ2500.
All in all, the two cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-420 featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic FZ2500 will offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older E-420 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-420 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2008-06-23 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | None | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426 gr (0.94 lbs) | 915 gr (2.02 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | 527 | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | 350 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $999 | $998 |