Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ35
77 Imaging
45 Features
36 Overall
41
72 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced June 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FZ38
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ35, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-420 (10MP) and the FZ35 (12MP) is pretty similar but the E-420 (Four Thirds) and FZ35 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe E-420 was manufactured 24 months earlier than the FZ35 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-420 grades versus the FZ35 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-420 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Panasonic FZ35
| E-420 | FZ35 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus E-420
| FZ35 | E-420 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2010 |  | June 2008 | Fresher by 24 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Panasonic FZ35
| E-420 | FZ35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal screen size |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-420 has got physical dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ35 has dimensions of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") and a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ35 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the E-420 against the FZ35.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-420 and FZ35 is 77 and 72 respectively.
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading technical specs. The graphic below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-420 and FZ35.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-420 because of its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Panasonic FZ35 will offer you more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The older E-420 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
| Olympus E-420 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus E-420 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
| Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2008-06-23 | 2010-07-06 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine V |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.4 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 8.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 426g (0.94 pounds) | 397g (0.88 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 527 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $999 | $999 |
