Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ35
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
72 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced June 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FZ38
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ35, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-420 (10MP) and the FZ35 (12MP) is pretty similar but the E-420 (Four Thirds) and FZ35 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-420 was manufactured 24 months earlier than the FZ35 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-420 grades versus the FZ35 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-420 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Panasonic FZ35
| E-420 | FZ35 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus E-420
| FZ35 | E-420 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2010 |  | June 2008 | Fresher by 24 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Panasonic FZ35
| E-420 | FZ35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal screen size |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-420 has got physical dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ35 has dimensions of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") and a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ35 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the E-420 against the FZ35.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-420 and FZ35 is 77 and 72 respectively.
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading technical specs. The graphic below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-420 and FZ35.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-420 because of its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Panasonic FZ35 will offer you more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The older E-420 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
| Olympus E-420 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus E-420 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
| Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2008-06-23 | 2010-07-06 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine V |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.4 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 8.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 426g (0.94 pounds) | 397g (0.88 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 527 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $999 | $999 |