Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ60
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0caf0/0caf02c15539c36b2fb3f81379859b5c5d17f544" alt="Olympus E-420 front Olympus E-420 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2ce8/f2ce890f5e0965ffc876c415de580524ef50e485" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ60 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ60 front"
68 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ60 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced June 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 493g - 120 x 81 x 92mm
- Announced July 2012
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FZ62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ60 Overview
Here is a extensive review of the Olympus E-420 versus Panasonic FZ60, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and FZ60 (16MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and FZ60 (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-420 was introduced 5 years before the FZ60 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ60 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the E-420 matches up against the FZ60 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ60 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-420 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ60. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-420 Gallery and Panasonic FZ60 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Panasonic FZ60
E-420 | FZ60 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ60 over the Olympus E-420
FZ60 | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2012 | ![]() | June 2008 | Fresher by 49 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Panasonic FZ60
E-420 | FZ60 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ60 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-420 has got outer dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ60 has sizing of 120mm x 81mm x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") with a weight of 493 grams (1.09 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-420 versus Panasonic FZ60 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at the time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-420 compared to the FZ60.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38212/382128041e642a2a01d6a8dfbc5934e54cdda48e" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ60 size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ60 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-420 and FZ60 is 77 and 68 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4f64/e4f64a56ab929209974f5554fddd26b6b0efa813" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ60 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ60 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ60 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizing just by checking out a spec sheet. The visual below may give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-420 and FZ60.
Clearly, the two cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-420 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic FZ60 will produce more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older E-420 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15b2d/15b2d2003a57b3aca961da95f9f5181aaf9c5901" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ60 sensor size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ60 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ60 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d6f6/0d6f679efd0fd399f42c788c48ba44a8ea38eced" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ60 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ60 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FZ60 Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ60 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-420 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ60 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ62 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2008-06-23 | 2012-07-18 |
Body design | Compact SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.2 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 202 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 13.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426g (0.94 lb) | 493g (1.09 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 120 x 81 x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | 450 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $999 | $350 |