Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic TS2
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0caf0/0caf02c15539c36b2fb3f81379859b5c5d17f544" alt="Olympus E-420 front Olympus E-420 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff78f/ff78f6be0ac1bb119e52dbaed8fc3dd165812a39" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS2 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS2 front"
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic TS2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced June 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 188g - 99 x 63 x 24mm
- Launched January 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FT2
- Superseded the Panasonic TS1
- Later Model is Panasonic TS3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic TS2 Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Olympus E-420 and Panasonic TS2, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and TS2 (14MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and TS2 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-420 was brought out 19 months earlier than the TS2 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic TS2 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-420 scores against the TS2 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic TS2 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-420 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS2. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-420 Gallery and Panasonic TS2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Panasonic TS2
E-420 | TS2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic TS2 over the Olympus E-420
TS2 | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2010 | ![]() | June 2008 | More recent by 19 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Panasonic TS2
E-420 | TS2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic TS2 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-420 features physical dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Panasonic TS2 has measurements of 99mm x 63mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-420 and Panasonic TS2 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-420 versus the TS2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bce0/1bce024e00cc0329f4c9c07ad7b2c83bf8a4f3c3" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic TS2 size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic TS2 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-420 and TS2 is 77 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4837c/4837ccc1ff01ea172264856c4bdfb1cbd4eff491" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic TS2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic TS2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic TS2 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements merely by going over a spec sheet. The visual here should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-420 and TS2.
Clearly, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-420 featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Panasonic TS2 will offer you extra detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images a little more aggressively. The older E-420 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6923/c692382be417f939a48e29f81c48d6ea76100f8e" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic TS2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic TS2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic TS2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/702c7/702c7f728ccfb75cf4ac9dead9e5204756d90225" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic TS2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic TS2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic TS2 Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-420 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS2 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-FT2 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2008-06-23 | 2010-01-26 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-128mm (4.6x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1300s |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | AVCHD Lite |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426 grams (0.94 lbs) | 188 grams (0.41 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 99 x 63 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $999 | $350 |