Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS25
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0caf0/0caf02c15539c36b2fb3f81379859b5c5d17f544" alt="Olympus E-420 front Olympus E-420 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5708/e57084ceb52f3aee5776564caad37a3d062fbbca" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 front"
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced June 2008
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Announced January 2013
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ35
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS20
- New Model is Panasonic ZS30
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS25 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS25, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and ZS25 (16MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and ZS25 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-420 was released 5 years prior to the ZS25 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS25 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-420 matches up vs the ZS25 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS25 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-420 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Panasonic ZS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Panasonic ZS25
E-420 | ZS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS25 over the Olympus E-420
ZS25 | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | June 2008 | More modern by 55 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Panasonic ZS25
E-420 | ZS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS25 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-420 comes with outer dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS25 has proportions of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS25 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-420 vs the ZS25.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82503/8250381dd9d2c7d15c52dd1550176ce369d14021" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS25 size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS25 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-420 and ZS25 is 77 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70f6f/70f6f6d03e06ef71ca07ce7d9e5b2030e8debe14" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS25 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS25 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS25 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading specifications. The image here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-420 and ZS25.
To sum up, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-420 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Panasonic ZS25 will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged E-420 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0159/a0159a5b5b819885137114cce6d73f5e51ef3320" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS25 sensor size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS25 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS25 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dce77/dce777aefa988b49f3275f4b56e17929168e0f2e" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS25 Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-420 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 |
Alternative name | - | Lumix DMC-TZ35 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2008-06-23 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 15 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1200 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 426 gr (0.94 pounds) | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 260 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $999 | $300 |