Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS45
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0caf0/0caf02c15539c36b2fb3f81379859b5c5d17f544" alt="Olympus E-420 front Olympus E-420 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc9/47cc9bc94afeaa31cc3dde1b811c34d098a7d562" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS45 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced June 2008
- Older Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 249g - 108 x 60 x 32mm
- Revealed January 2015
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ57
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS40
- Refreshed by Panasonic ZS50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS45 Overview
Here is a in depth overview of the Olympus E-420 and Panasonic ZS45, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and ZS45 (16MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and ZS45 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-420 was introduced 7 years earlier than the ZS45 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS45 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-420 scores vs the ZS45 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS45 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-420 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-420 Gallery and Panasonic ZS45 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Panasonic ZS45
E-420 | ZS45 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS45 over the Olympus E-420
ZS45 | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2015 | ![]() | June 2008 | Fresher by 79 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Panasonic ZS45
E-420 | ZS45 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS45 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-420 comes with external dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS45 has measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 32mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-420 and Panasonic ZS45 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the E-420 and the ZS45.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d4eb/4d4ebb5d5246e38225b8111482c4a8d59655677d" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS45 size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS45 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-420 and ZS45 is 77 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ee4/73ee4410cc97fad359bb09838ac0295c7dfc1680" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS45 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS45 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS45 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing just by checking technical specs. The graphic below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-420 and ZS45.
As you have seen, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-420 having a bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic ZS45 will give you greater detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older E-420 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b614/6b61428d631823ebd4512e9ebec23dea65f06d02" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS45 sensor size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS45 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS45 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0f3d/f0f3d1d607845438e85ee6e1f6c08502a5f084d7" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS45 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS45 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic ZS45 Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-420 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-TZ57 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2008-06-23 | 2015-01-06 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 426 grams (0.94 lb) | 249 grams (0.55 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 108 x 60 x 32mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 350 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $999 | $300 |