Olympus E-420 vs Pentax E85
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
95 Imaging
35 Features
10 Overall
25
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax E85 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Launched June 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 145g - 93 x 58 x 24mm
- Announced September 2009
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax E85 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-420 versus Pentax E85, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the E-420 (10MP) and the E85 (12MP) is pretty close but the E-420 (Four Thirds) and E85 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-420 was revealed 15 months before the E85 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax E85 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-420 matches up vs the E85 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax E85 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-420 and Pentax Optio E85. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-420 Gallery and Pentax E85 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Pentax E85
E-420 | E85 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Pentax E85 over the Olympus E-420
E85 | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2009 | June 2008 | More recent by 15 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Pentax E85
E-420 | E85 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical screen dimensions | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax E85 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-420 enjoys physical dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Pentax E85 has measurements of 93mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 145 grams (0.32 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-420 versus Pentax E85 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-420 and the E85.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-420 and E85 is 77 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax E85 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to envision the difference in sensor measurements merely by looking through technical specs. The photograph here should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-420 and E85.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-420 with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Pentax E85 will provide you with more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older E-420 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax E85 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax E85 Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Pentax Optio E85 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus E-420 | Pentax Optio E85 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2008-06-23 | 2009-09-17 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 32-96mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.9-5.2 |
Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 2s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426 grams (0.94 lbs) | 145 grams (0.32 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 93 x 58 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | D-LI95 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $999 | $0 |