Olympus E-420 vs Pentax W90
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40


94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax W90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released June 2008
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 108 x 59 x 25mm
- Introduced February 2010

Olympus E-420 vs. Pentax Optio W90: A Hands-On Deep Dive for Your Next Camera Choice
When it comes to choosing a camera, the options can feel overwhelming - especially when you find two very different beasts vying for your attention. The Olympus E-420, a compact DSLR from 2008, and the Pentax Optio W90, a rugged point-and-shoot from 2010, sit in completely different camps of the photography world. But each carries its own charm and purpose. As someone who’s spent fifteen years testing cameras - soaking in everything from sensor nuances to focusing quirks - I’ve put these two through their paces to help you decide which suits your photography ambitions and lifestyle best.
Let’s get started by noting the fundamentally different design philosophies here: Olympus is a small DSLR with a Four Thirds sensor designed for enthusiasts dipping into interchangeable lenses, while the Pentax is a hardy compact made to survive adventure and splashy environments. So, what’s the real story when you look deeper? Let’s find out.
Wrist-Friendly or Club-For-Thumbs: Handling and Ergonomics
How a camera feels in your hand often makes or breaks the shooting experience. The Olympus E-420, true to its DSLR roots, is designed to fit naturally in your hand with a modest bump for grip - not bulky but just enough to hold securely. This is especially appealing for longer shoots or when handling telephoto lenses. At 130x91x53 mm, it's remarkably compact for a DSLR and weighs in at 426g, impressively light for its class.
In contrast, the Pentax W90 is a tough little creature built for durability rather than ergonomics. Measuring 108x59x25 mm and just 164g, it’s pocket-friendly and super portable, with a solid feel despite being ruggedized for waterproof, dustproof, shockproof, and freezeproof environments.
Quick take: If you want the classic DSLR feel with manual controls accessible at your fingertips, Olympus wins here. But if portability and all-weather durability are priorities, Pentax feels more at home on an outdoor adventure.
Design and Control Layout: Where Buttons Meet Intuition
Peering down from the top, the Olympus sports a neat array of buttons and dials, including a mode dial with owners’ clubs for priority modes like aperture and shutter priority, plus manual shooting and exposure compensation. This control layout is vital for photographers who like to tweak settings on the fly.
By comparison, the Pentax W90 scales back to the essentials with fewer physical controls. It foregoes a viewfinder entirely, relying on its 2.7-inch screen for all framing and menu navigation. Its fixed lens removes the need for controls related to lens functions, simplifying the handling but limiting manual intervention.
My takeaway: Olympus′s DSLR controls definitely give you more creative freedom and speed, which pros and serious hobbyists appreciate. Pentax’s minimalism is fine for casual shooters who want quick, rugged convenience over fiddly details.
Sensor Size and Image Quality: More Than Just Resolution Numbers
Now to the ultra-important guts of the camera - the sensor. The Olympus E-420 features a Four Thirds sensor measuring 17.3 x 13 mm with a resolution of 10 megapixels and a native ISO range of 100-1600. Its sensor is paired with a TruePic III processor, capable of delivering decent images with good dynamic range (10.4 EV at base ISO, according to DxO Mark testing) and color depth (21.5 bits).
The Pentax W90 slides wildly in the other direction, using a much tinier 1/2.3” (6.17 x 4.55 mm) CCD sensor with a 12MP resolution and an extended ISO range up to 6400 (though much of the higher ISO is boosted and noisy). The compact’s sensor area is roughly eight times smaller than Olympus’s.
This difference in sensor size directly impacts low-light performance, dynamic range, and fine detail resolution. The Olympus’s larger sensor generally translates into superior image quality, better noise control at higher ISOs, and smoother tonal gradations. The Pentax’s sensor, optimized for compact convenience and waterproofing constraints, produces images suitable for snapshots but will lag behind in challenging light conditions or for print-quality crops.
Viewing and Interface: The Window to Your Shot
Both cameras sport fixed 2.7-inch LCD screens with a resolution of around 230k dots - a common spec in their eras. Olympus, as expected from DSLR design, offers an optical pentamirror finder with 95% coverage and 0.46x magnification, which is incredibly useful for precision framing and shooting stability outdoors, especially in bright daylight when LCDs can be hard to view.
Pentax tosses out a viewfinder altogether, relying solely on its rear LCD. This is common with compact cameras but can be a challenge in bright sunlight or when trying to conserve battery life.
The user interface on the Olympus favors photographers who appreciate physical dials and buttons for quick setting changes, while the Pentax uses a menu-driven touchscreen-free interface that's simpler (but slower) for adjusting settings like white balance or ISO.
Picture This: Real-World Image Samples
When shooting portraits, the Olympus E-420 with its larger sensor and interchangeable lenses can achieve smoother skin tones and subject isolation. Its 3-point autofocus system is basic by modern standards but includes phase detection, enabling quick focus acquisition on subjects. The smaller Pentax sensor keeps everything a bit more “flat” with less creamy bokeh and faces that sometimes lack nuanced skin tone gradation.
For landscapes, Olympus’s higher dynamic range puts it a step ahead, capturing more shadow and highlight detail. Pentax’s waterproofness comes at the expense of sensor size and optics sharpness, which impacts detail and color fidelity.
Wildlife and sports? Olympus’s 4 fps burst with continuous AF (contrast and phase detection hybrid) outpaces Pentax’s single shot speed and simple contrast-only AF. For macro enthusiasts, Pentax’s ability to focus as close as 1 cm for super close-ups is impressive, whereas Olympus relies on lens capabilities that vary depending on what you mount.
Shooting Styles and Genres Compared
Here’s the real nitty-gritty for photographers specialized in different fields:
-
Portrait Photography: Olympus’s larger sensor and manual aperture control let you play with depth-of-field for flattering background separation. Pentax’s fixed aperture zoom limits this, but its macro mode shines for close-up detail.
-
Landscape: Greater resolution and dynamic range favor Olympus for epic scene capture. Pentax’s waterproof housing could be a lifesaver on wet treks but sacrifices sharpness and tonal nuance.
-
Wildlife and Sports: Olympus’s faster focus tracking and higher burst rate help nail action shots. Pentax’s 1 fps burst and simpler autofocus won’t keep pace with moving critters or athletes.
-
Street Photography: Pentax’s diminutive size and discreet profile are appealing, making it less likely to disturb candid moments. Olympus is bulkier but offers better manual control if you prefer more creative input.
-
Macro: Although Olympus’s ecosystem supports dedicated macro lenses, Pentax offers an extremely close minimum focus distance out of the box, perfect for casual macro without extra gear.
-
Night/Astro Photography: Olympus’s higher native ISO and longer shutter speeds (down to 60 seconds) outclass Pentax’s 1.5s max in low-light scenarios. Olympus supports RAW, facilitating better post-processing for night scenes. Pentax only offers JPEGs.
-
Video: Pentax provides basic HD video at 1280x720 at 30 fps in Motion JPEG format, while Olympus has no video capability at all, which might surprise DSLR users today.
-
Travel Photography: Pentax’s rugged build, compact footprint, and waterproofing make it the ideal travel companion for all conditions. Olympus weighs more and isn’t weather sealed but offers versatile quality.
-
Professional Use: Olympus supports RAW files, manual modes, and external flash, suiting it for workflow integration. Pentax’s waterproof compact design and lack of RAW make it more a robust casual camera than a pro tool.
Autofocus and Performance: From My Lab to the Field
Testing autofocus speed, I found the Olympus E-420’s 3-point AF adequate in good light but a bit sluggish in low contrast or continuous tracking scenarios - typical for DSLRs of that generation. However, its phase detection AF in the optical viewfinder helps significantly compared to Pentax’s contrast-detection-only, often hunting autofocus in dimmer conditions.
Pentax’s 9-point contrast-detection AF works fine for stationary subjects but is slow and tends to overshoot focus in complex scenes or with moving targets. It’s also limited to single-shot focus - no continuous AF here.
Burst shooting speed is another real divider. Olympus delivers a solid 4 fps for brief action bursts, while Pentax remains at a pedestrian 1 fps, relegating it to casual shooters only.
Build Quality, Weather Sealing, and Durability
The Pentax W90 is purpose-built for harsh environments: waterproof to underwater depths, dustproof, shockproof, and even freezeproof down to sub-zero temperatures. This ruggedness is engineered into a compact, lightweight body, ideal for adventurers and underwater shooters.
Olympus E-420 lacks any environmental sealing and carries typical DSLR fragility - avoid moisture or dust and treat it like the delicate instrument it is.
Battery, Storage, and Connectivity faceoff
Olympus relies on a rechargeable battery pack with an impressive claimed capacity of 500 shots per charge, which is excellent for a DSLR. Pentax uses a replaceable D-LI68 battery common to Pentax compacts, though exact battery life specs are vague; expect fewer shots, typical for compacts.
Both cameras support single memory card slots, but Olympus uses CompactFlash (Type I or II) alongside xD Picture Cards; Pentax uses SD/SDHC cards and has some internal memory. USB 2.0 is the sole wired data interface on both, no HDMI ports or wireless features save for Pentax’s Eye-Fi wireless card compatibility - handy for quick in-field transfers.
Lens Ecosystem & Expansion
Olympus’s Micro Four Thirds mount opens doors to a wide selection of lenses (45+ native lenses available in its era), from wide-angle primes and professional macro lenses to fast telephotos - adding immense creative firepower.
Pentax’s fixed 28-140mm (5x zoom) lens limits your framing and lens control but ensures compactness and reliability.
The Numbers Don’t Lie: Performance Ratings Summary
Here’s a snapshot scored roughly by image quality, speed, build, features, and value (based on industry benchmarks and my hands-on testing):
Genre-focused scoring highlights Olympus’s edge in image quality and versatility, while Pentax excels in ruggedness and portability:
Pros and Cons at a Glance
Feature | Olympus E-420 | Pentax Optio W90 |
---|---|---|
Image Quality | Good dynamic range, better low light | Limited by smaller sensor |
Sensor Size | Larger Four Thirds | Tiny 1/2.3” CCD |
Lens Flexibility | Interchangeable, 45+ lenses | Fixed 28-140mm zoom |
Body & Build | Compact DSLR, non-sealed | Rugged, waterproof, dustproof |
Viewfinder | Optical pentamirror | None |
Autofocus | Hybrid phase + contrast | Contrast only, slower |
Continuous Shooting | 4 fps (decent for action) | 1 fps (slow) |
ISO Range | 100-1600 native | 80-6400 (boosted, noisy) |
Video | None | 720p HD 30fps |
Battery Life | Approx. 500 shots per charge | Unknown, likely lower |
Weight & Dimensions | 426g, DSLR size | 164g, pocketable |
Price (New at launch) | Approx. $999 | Approx. $120 |
Who Should Buy Which?
-
Entry-Level DSLR Enthusiasts or Budget-Conscious Hobbyists: Olympus E-420 is still worth seeking used if you want to learn the ropes of manual exposure, play with a variety of lenses, shoot RAW, and prioritize image quality over portability. Its synced manual and priority modes help you grow creatively.
-
Adventure, Travel, and Casual Shooters: Pentax W90 is your go-to waterproof, pocketable companion especially if you prioritize ruggedness and convenience over perfect image quality. Throw it in your backpack without worry, shoot quick snapshots underwater or snowy hikes.
-
Content Creators on a Budget: Olympus offers flexibility with RAW files and better low-light, but no video support. Pentax covers basic video and has a decent zoom for varied shots without carrying extra lenses.
-
Pros and Semi-Pro Professionals: Neither is ideal today for demanding pro work; Olympus’s sensor and lens mount might be appealing for backups or vintage workflows, but modern alternatives exist. Pentax is mainly a specialty compact.
Final Verdict: The Right Tool for Your Photography Mission
Both the Olympus E-420 and Pentax Optio W90 are products of their time, aimed at completely different photographers and shooting situations.
If I had to pick for a versatile photographic learning platform or semi-serious use, the Olympus E-420 wins hands-down - its image quality, manual controls, interchangeable lens mount, and longer battery life make it a rewarding tool (assuming you don’t mind carrying a small DSLR and lack weather sealing).
On the other hand, if you are a cheapskate outdoorsy type, beach lover, or someone who craves the convenience of a rugged, tiny waterproof camera for snapshots and occasional macro, the Pentax Optio W90 is a steal at a fraction of the price with robust build and respectable basic imaging.
Ultimately, your choice boils down to this: do you want creative control and image quality (Olympus), or are you after durability and simplicity (Pentax)?
Thank you for reading my detailed comparison! If you have questions about either system or want tips on lenses or accessories for either model, feel free to ask. Happy shooting!
Image Credits
- Physical Size and Ergonomics:
- Top View Design:
- Sensor Specs:
- LCD and Interface:
- Sample Images:
- Overall Ratings:
- Genre-Specific Scores:
Your next camera should feel like an extension of your vision, not a burden - keep this in mind as you decide between these two charmingly different shooters!
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax W90 Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Pentax Optio W90 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus E-420 | Pentax Optio W90 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Released | 2008-06-23 | 2010-02-24 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Prime |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.90 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 426 gr (0.94 lb) | 164 gr (0.36 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 108 x 59 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $999 | $120 |