Olympus E-420 vs Pentax WG-1
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax WG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed June 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-420 vs Pentax WG-1 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-420 versus Pentax WG-1, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Pentax. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and WG-1 (14MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and WG-1 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-420 was launched 3 years earlier than the WG-1 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax WG-1 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-420 matches up vs the WG-1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-420 vs Pentax WG-1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-420 & Pentax Optio WG-1. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Pentax WG-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Pentax WG-1
| E-420 | WG-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 over the Olympus E-420
| WG-1 | E-420 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2011 | June 2008 | Newer by 31 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Pentax WG-1
| E-420 | WG-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal screen size | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax WG-1 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-420 comes with outer measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-1 has dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-420 versus Pentax WG-1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-420 compared to the WG-1.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-420 and WG-1 is 77 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax WG-1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by checking technical specs. The picture below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-420 and WG-1.
As you have seen, both of those cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-420 because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Pentax WG-1 will give extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots more aggressively. The more aged E-420 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax WG-1 Specifications
| Olympus E-420 | Pentax Optio WG-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus E-420 | Pentax Optio WG-1 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2008-06-23 | 2011-02-07 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.90 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 426g (0.94 pounds) | 157g (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 527 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photographs | 260 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $999 | $350 |