Olympus E-420 vs Pentax WG-1
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax WG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed June 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2011
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax WG-1 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-420 versus Pentax WG-1, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Pentax. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and WG-1 (14MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and WG-1 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-420 was launched 3 years earlier than the WG-1 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax WG-1 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-420 matches up vs the WG-1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax WG-1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-420 & Pentax Optio WG-1. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Pentax WG-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Pentax WG-1
E-420 | WG-1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 over the Olympus E-420
WG-1 | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2011 | June 2008 | Newer by 31 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Pentax WG-1
E-420 | WG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal screen size | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax WG-1 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-420 comes with outer measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-1 has dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-420 versus Pentax WG-1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-420 compared to the WG-1.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-420 and WG-1 is 77 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax WG-1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by checking technical specs. The picture below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-420 and WG-1.
As you have seen, both of those cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-420 because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Pentax WG-1 will give extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots more aggressively. The more aged E-420 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax WG-1 Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Pentax Optio WG-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus E-420 | Pentax Optio WG-1 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2008-06-23 | 2011-02-07 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.90 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426g (0.94 pounds) | 157g (0.35 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 260 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $999 | $350 |