Olympus E-420 vs Pentax Q-S1
77 Imaging
45 Features
36 Overall
41
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released June 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Revealed August 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-420 vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
Following is a extended analysis of the Olympus E-420 vs Pentax Q-S1, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the E-420 (10MP) and the Q-S1 (12MP) is relatively close but the E-420 (Four Thirds) and Q-S1 (1/1.7") come with totally different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-420 was launched 7 years before the Q-S1 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-420 matches up against the Q-S1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-420 vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-420 and Pentax Q-S1. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-420 Gallery and Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Pentax Q-S1
| E-420 | Q-S1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Olympus E-420
| Q-S1 | E-420 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2014 |  | June 2008 | More modern by 74 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Pentax Q-S1
| E-420 | Q-S1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-420 features external dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Pentax Q-S1 has measurements of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-420 vs Pentax Q-S1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that moment. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-420 compared to the Q-S1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-420 and Q-S1 is 77 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to see the gap in sensor sizes only by researching a spec sheet. The picture below will give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-420 and Q-S1.
Clearly, each of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-420 featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Pentax Q-S1 will result in more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged E-420 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-420 vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
| Olympus E-420 | Pentax Q-S1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus E-420 | Pentax Q-S1 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2008-06-23 | 2014-08-04 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | Q Engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax Q |
| Number of lenses | 45 | 8 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 426g (0.94 lb) | 203g (0.45 lb) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 527 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | 250 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI68 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $999 | $250 |
