Clicky

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX1

Portability
77
Imaging
45
Features
36
Overall
41
Olympus E-420 front
 
Ricoh CX1 front
Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
30
Overall
31

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs

Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Announced June 2008
  • Replaced the Olympus E-410
Ricoh CX1
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
  • Introduced February 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview

Below, we are matching up the Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX1, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the E-420 (10MP) and the CX1 (9MP) is very comparable but the E-420 (Four Thirds) and CX1 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizes.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

The E-420 was unveiled 8 months prior to the CX1 so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-420 grades against the CX1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Ricoh CX1

 E-420 CX1 

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus E-420

 CX1 E-420 
IntroducedFebruary 2009June 2008Fresher by 8 months
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kSharper display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Ricoh CX1

 E-420 CX1 
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-420 features exterior dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Ricoh CX1 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is the front view scale comparison of the E-420 and the CX1.

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX1 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-420 and CX1 is 77 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing only by checking out specs. The photograph here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-420 and CX1.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-420 with its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Olympus E-420 will provide more detail having an extra 1MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The older E-420 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-420
Portrait photography with Ricoh CX1
57
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
MP count low (10 megapixels)
25
has manual focus
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
MP count low (9MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-420 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh CX1 as a Street photography camera
64
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
lighter than competition in class (426g)
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
55
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-420 Sports photography advice
Ricoh CX1 Sports photography advice
39
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
low battery power (500 shots)
26
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
MP count low (9 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-420
Travel photography with Ricoh CX1
53
lighter than competition in class (426 grams)
flash built-in
no Timelapse mode
low battery power (500 shots)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
59
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
MP count low (9MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-420 Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh CX1 Landscape photography highlights
47
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
no image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
low battery power (500 per charge)
no Timelapse mode
42
has manual focus
decently wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
manual exposure not possible
MP count low (9MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-420 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh CX1 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video shooting
28
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have mic socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-420 and Ricoh CX1
 Olympus E-420Ricoh CX1
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus E-420 Ricoh CX1
Category Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2008-06-23 2009-02-19
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 9 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 3456 x 2592
Highest native ISO 1600 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-200mm (7.1x)
Highest aperture - f/3.3-5.2
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 4.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.00 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 640x480
Video format - Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 426 grams (0.94 lb) 180 grams (0.40 lb)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 527 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 images -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model - DB-70
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at release $999 $299