Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX1
77 Imaging
45 Features
36 Overall
41
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced June 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2009
Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX1, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the E-420 (10MP) and the CX1 (9MP) is very comparable but the E-420 (Four Thirds) and CX1 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizes.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe E-420 was unveiled 8 months prior to the CX1 so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-420 grades against the CX1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-420 & Ricoh CX1. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Ricoh CX1
E-420 | CX1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus E-420
CX1 | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2009 | June 2008 | Fresher by 8 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Ricoh CX1
E-420 | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-420 features exterior dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Ricoh CX1 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is the front view scale comparison of the E-420 and the CX1.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-420 and CX1 is 77 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing only by checking out specs. The photograph here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-420 and CX1.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-420 with its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Olympus E-420 will provide more detail having an extra 1MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The older E-420 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Ricoh CX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus E-420 | Ricoh CX1 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2008-06-23 | 2009-02-19 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3456 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.2 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426 grams (0.94 lb) | 180 grams (0.40 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | DB-70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $999 | $299 |