Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX2
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released June 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released August 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
The following is a complete comparison of the Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX2, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the E-420 (10MP) and the CX2 (9MP) is very comparable but the E-420 (Four Thirds) and CX2 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-420 was manufactured 14 months prior to the CX2 making them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-420 scores vs the CX2 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-420 & Ricoh CX2. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Ricoh CX2
| E-420 | CX2 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus E-420
| CX2 | E-420 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2009 | June 2008 | Newer by 14 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Ricoh CX2
| E-420 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera, you need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-420 has outer measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX2 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX2 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the E-420 versus the CX2.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-420 and CX2 is 77 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to picture the gap in sensor dimensions merely by seeing specs. The picture here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-420 and CX2.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-420 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-420 will show greater detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged E-420 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Olympus E-420 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus E-420 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2008-06-23 | 2009-08-20 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 426 gr (0.94 lb) | 185 gr (0.41 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 527 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $999 | $341 |