Clicky

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX2

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
36
Overall
40
Olympus E-420 front
 
Ricoh CX2 front
Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
35
Overall
33

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs

Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Released June 2008
  • Old Model is Olympus E-410
Ricoh CX2
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Released August 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview

The following is a complete comparison of the Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX2, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the E-420 (10MP) and the CX2 (9MP) is very comparable but the E-420 (Four Thirds) and CX2 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizing.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-420 was manufactured 14 months prior to the CX2 making them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-420 scores vs the CX2 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Ricoh CX2

 E-420 CX2 

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus E-420

 CX2 E-420 
ReleasedAugust 2009June 2008Newer by 14 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kCrisper display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Ricoh CX2

 E-420 CX2 
Focus manually More exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither has Touch friendly display

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera, you need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-420 has outer measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX2 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX2 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the E-420 versus the CX2.

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX2 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-420 and CX2 is 77 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX2 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is hard to picture the gap in sensor dimensions merely by seeing specs. The picture here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-420 and CX2.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-420 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-420 will show greater detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged E-420 will be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX2 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-420 Portrait photography information
Ricoh CX2 Portrait photography information
56
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
low resolution (10 megapixels)
25
has manual focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
MP count low (9MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-420 Street photography details
Ricoh CX2 Street photography details
64
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
lighter than competition in class (426 grams)
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (185 grams)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-420
Sports photography with Ricoh CX2
38
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect autofocus
max fps low (4.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (10 megapixels)
bad battery pack (500 CIPA)
26
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
MP count low (9MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-420
Travel photography with Ricoh CX2
52
lighter than competition in class (426g)
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
bad battery pack (500 per charge)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
66
lighter than competition (185 grams)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
long zoom (300mm)
MP count low (9MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-420 Landscape photography details
Ricoh CX2 Landscape photography details
47
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen is small (2.7 inch)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (10MP)
bad battery pack (500 CIPA)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
42
has manual focus
really wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual exposure
MP count low (9 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-420 Vlogging factors
Ricoh CX2 Vlogging factors
9
no video
30
really wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (185g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of mic socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-420 and Ricoh CX2
 Olympus E-420Ricoh CX2
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus E-420 Ricoh CX2
Category Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2008-06-23 2009-08-20
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 9 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 3456 x 2592
Highest native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-300mm (10.7x)
Highest aperture - f/3.5-5.6
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 8s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 4.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.00 m (ISO 400)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 640x480
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 426 gr (0.94 lb) 185 gr (0.41 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 527 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 shots -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model - DB-70
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $999 $341