Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh WG-50
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed June 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2017
Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Below is a detailed overview of the Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh WG-50, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and WG-50 (16MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and WG-50 (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-420 was manufactured 10 years prior to the WG-50 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-420 grades against the WG-50 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-420 & Ricoh WG-50. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Ricoh WG-50
E-420 | WG-50 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Olympus E-420
WG-50 | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2017 | June 2008 | More recent by 108 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Ricoh WG-50
E-420 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical screen sizing | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-420 enjoys external measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-50 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh WG-50 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select during that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-420 and the WG-50.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-420 and WG-50 is 77 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to picture the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading specifications. The graphic here will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-420 and WG-50.
To sum up, the two cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-420 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Ricoh WG-50 will offer greater detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The older E-420 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus E-420 | Ricoh WG-50 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2008-06-23 | 2017-05-24 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | On, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426 grams (0.94 pounds) | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | 300 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $999 | $280 |