Clicky

Olympus E-420 vs Samsung HZ35W

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
36
Overall
40
Olympus E-420 front
 
Samsung HZ35W front
Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
42
Overall
37

Olympus E-420 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs

Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Announced June 2008
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-410
Samsung HZ35W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
  • Revealed June 2010
  • Also Known as WB650
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-420 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview

Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus E-420 versus Samsung HZ35W, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the E-420 (10MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is fairly well matched but the E-420 (Four Thirds) and HZ35W (1/2.3") offer different sensor size.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-420 was released 24 months before the HZ35W making them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.

Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-420 scores against the HZ35W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Samsung HZ35W

 E-420 HZ35W 

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus E-420

 HZ35W E-420 
RevealedJune 2010June 2008Fresher by 24 months
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution614k230kCrisper display (+384k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Samsung HZ35W

 E-420 HZ35W 
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Olympus E-420 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry your camera, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-420 features outside measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-420 versus Samsung HZ35W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the E-420 against the HZ35W.

Olympus E-420 vs Samsung HZ35W size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-420 and HZ35W is 77 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-420 vs Samsung HZ35W top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizing only by checking a spec sheet. The photograph below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-420 and HZ35W.

Clearly, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-420 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Samsung HZ35W will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older E-420 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-420 vs Samsung HZ35W sensor size comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-420 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-420 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung HZ35W Portrait photography highlights
56
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
low resolution (10 megapixels)
34
focusing manually
supports face detect focus
no external flash support
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-420 Street photography info
Samsung HZ35W Street photography info
64
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
lighter than competitors (426g)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
60
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (245g)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-420 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung HZ35W as a Sports photography camera
38
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
continuous shooting slow (4.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (10MP)
terrible battery pack (500 per charge)
42
excellent zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports tracking focus
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-420
Travel photography with Samsung HZ35W
52
lighter than competitors (426 grams)
flash built-in
no Timelapse recording
terrible battery pack (500 CIPA)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly display
63
lighter than competition (245g)
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
great reach (360mm)
no Time Lapse recording
low MP (12MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-420 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung HZ35W as a Landscape photography camera
47
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
tiny screen (2.7")
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (10 megapixels)
terrible battery pack (500 shots)
no Timelapse recording
43
focusing manually
pretty wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
no Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-420
Vlogging with Samsung HZ35W
9
can't record video
31
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focus
lighter than competition (245g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-420 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-420 and Samsung HZ35W
 Olympus E-420Samsung HZ35W
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus E-420 Samsung HZ35W
Also Known as - WB650
Class Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2008-06-23 2010-06-16
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-360mm (15.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.2-5.8
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dots 614k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 16 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 4.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 5.00 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 426 grams (0.94 lb) 245 grams (0.54 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 527 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photographs -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID - SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch pricing $999 $300