Clicky

Olympus E-420 vs Samsung HZ50W

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
36
Overall
40
Olympus E-420 front
 
Samsung HZ50W front
Portability
70
Imaging
37
Features
44
Overall
39

Olympus E-420 vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs

Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Released June 2008
  • Old Model is Olympus E-410
Samsung HZ50W
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
  • 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
  • Released May 2010
  • Also referred to as WB5500
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-420 vs Samsung HZ50W Overview

On this page, we are comparing the Olympus E-420 versus Samsung HZ50W, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and HZ50W (14MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and HZ50W (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-420 was manufactured 22 months prior to the HZ50W making them a generation away from each other. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-420 grades versus the HZ50W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Samsung HZ50W

 E-420 HZ50W 

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Olympus E-420

 HZ50W E-420 
ReleasedMay 2010June 2008More modern by 22 months
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Samsung HZ50W

 E-420 HZ50W 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither contains Touch friendly display

Olympus E-420 vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-420 has got outside measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Samsung HZ50W has measurements of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-420 versus Samsung HZ50W in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the E-420 against the HZ50W.

Olympus E-420 vs Samsung HZ50W size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-420 and HZ50W is 77 and 70 respectively.

Olympus E-420 vs Samsung HZ50W top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes only by reviewing specs. The pic below may offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-420 and HZ50W.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-420 because of its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung HZ50W will deliver greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-420 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus E-420 vs Samsung HZ50W sensor size comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-420 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-420 Portrait photography factors
Samsung HZ50W Portrait photography factors
56
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
low resolution (10 megapixels)
46
focusing manually
good megapixels (14MP)
saves RAW files
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-420 as a Street photography camera
Samsung HZ50W as a Street photography camera
64
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
lighter than competition in class (426 grams)
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
56
has image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-420 Sports photography factors
Samsung HZ50W Sports photography factors
38
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
low fps (4.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (10 megapixels)
bad battery pack (500 per charge)
48
great zoom range (26-676mm 26.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-420 Travel photography details
Samsung HZ50W Travel photography details
52
lighter than competition in class (426 grams)
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse function
bad battery pack (500 shots)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly display
58
good megapixels (14MP)
has built in flash
relatively wide (26mm)
very long zoom (676mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-420 Landscape photography info
Samsung HZ50W Landscape photography info
47
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen is small (2.7")
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (10MP)
bad battery pack (500 CIPA)
missing Time Lapse function
51
focusing manually
relatively wide (26mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (14MP)
saves RAW files
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-420 Vlogging advice
Samsung HZ50W Vlogging advice
9
no video shooting
24
relatively wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have microphone port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-420 vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-420 and Samsung HZ50W
 Olympus E-420Samsung HZ50W
General Information
Company Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus E-420 Samsung HZ50W
Also called as - WB5500
Category Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2008-06-23 2010-05-03
Body design Compact SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Highest boosted ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 64
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-676mm (26.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8-5.0
Macro focus distance - 10cm
Available lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7" 3"
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 16 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 4.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 5.60 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 426 grams (0.94 lb) 426 grams (0.94 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 527 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 images -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model - SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SC/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $999 $250