Olympus E-420 vs Sony NEX-3
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
89 Imaging
54 Features
55 Overall
54
Olympus E-420 vs Sony NEX-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released June 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 297g - 117 x 62 x 33mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Newer Model is Sony NEX-C3
Olympus E-420 vs Sony NEX-3 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-420 versus Sony NEX-3, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and NEX-3 (14MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and NEX-3 (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-420 was revealed 23 months earlier than the NEX-3 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony NEX-3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-420 matches up vs the NEX-3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-420 vs Sony NEX-3 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-420 & Sony Alpha NEX-3. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Sony NEX-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Sony NEX-3
E-420 | NEX-3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3 over the Olympus E-420
NEX-3 | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2010 | June 2008 | More modern by 23 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Sony NEX-3
E-420 | NEX-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-420 vs Sony NEX-3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-420 provides physical dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Sony NEX-3 has measurements of 117mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 297 grams (0.65 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-420 versus Sony NEX-3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the E-420 versus the NEX-3.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-420 and NEX-3 is 77 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-420 vs Sony NEX-3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizes just by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic below might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-420 and NEX-3.
As you can see, both the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-420 using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Sony NEX-3 will offer you greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged E-420 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-420 vs Sony NEX-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-420 vs Sony NEX-3 Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Sony Alpha NEX-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-420 | Sony Alpha NEX-3 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2008-06-23 | 2010-06-07 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Available lenses | 45 | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 426 gr (0.94 lb) | 297 gr (0.65 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 117 x 62 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | 68 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | 22.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 12.0 |
DXO Low light rating | 527 | 830 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | 330 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $999 | $0 |