Clicky

Olympus E-420 vs Sony QX1

Portability
77
Imaging
45
Features
36
Overall
41
Olympus E-420 front
 
Sony Alpha QX1 front
Portability
90
Imaging
63
Features
48
Overall
57

Olympus E-420 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs

Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Introduced June 2008
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-410
Sony QX1
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
  • Released September 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-420 vs Sony QX1 Overview

The following is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-420 vs Sony QX1, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Lens-style by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and QX1 (20MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and QX1 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor measurements.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-420 was introduced 7 years earlier than the QX1 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.

Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-420 scores against the QX1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Sony QX1

 E-420 QX1 
Display dimensions2.7""Larger display (+2.7")
Display resolution230k0kSharper display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Olympus E-420

 QX1 E-420 
ReleasedSeptember 2014June 2008Newer by 75 months
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Sony QX1

 E-420 QX1 
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Olympus E-420 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to travel with your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-420 has got outside measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Sony QX1 has dimensions of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-420 vs Sony QX1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the E-420 against the QX1.

Olympus E-420 vs Sony QX1 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-420 and QX1 is 77 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-420 vs Sony QX1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its difficult to see the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading specifications. The picture below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-420 and QX1.

Plainly, both the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-420 using its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Sony QX1 will deliver extra detail using its extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images more aggressively. The more aged E-420 is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus E-420 vs Sony QX1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-420 vs Sony QX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-420
Portrait photography with Sony QX1
57
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
MP count low (10MP)
66
focusing manually
good resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
has face detect focusing
exports RAW formats
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-420 Street photography factors
Sony QX1 Street photography factors
64
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
lighter than competitors (426 grams)
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
69
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
features focus via touch
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
heavier than others (216 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-420 as a Sports photography camera
Sony QX1 as a Sports photography camera
39
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has phase detect auto focus
slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
terrible battery life (500 shots)
56
good resolution (20MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
better than average battery power (440 CIPA)
slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
does not have phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-420 Travel photography advice
Sony QX1 Travel photography advice
53
lighter than competitors (426 grams)
has built in flash
no Timelapse mode
terrible battery life (500 per charge)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
71
better than average battery power (440 per charge)
features focus via touch
good resolution (20MP)
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than others (216 grams)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-420 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony QX1 as a Landscape photography camera
47
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
tiny screen (2.7")
no image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
terrible battery life (500 per charge)
no Timelapse mode
64
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Sony E mount)
good resolution (20MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
better than average battery power (440 shots)
screen is somewhat small ( inches)
lack of manual mode
lack of image stabilization
lack of Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-420
Vlogging with Sony QX1
9
lack of video recording
32
touch screen
has face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
lack of mic jack
heavier than others (216g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-420 vs Sony QX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-420 and Sony QX1
 Olympus E-420Sony Alpha QX1
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-420 Sony Alpha QX1
Class Entry-Level DSLR Lens-style
Introduced 2008-06-23 2014-09-03
Body design Compact SLR Lens-style
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.2 x 15.4mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 357.3mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 5456 x 3632
Max native ISO 1600 16000
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 3 25
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.6
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inches -
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 0 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 4.0 frames/s 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30p)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 426g (0.94 pounds) 216g (0.48 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 527 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 shots 440 shots
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro
Storage slots 1 1
Price at launch $999 $500