Olympus E-420 vs Sony HX1
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
67 Imaging
32 Features
36 Overall
33
Olympus E-420 vs Sony HX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced June 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 28-560mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 544g - 115 x 83 x 92mm
- Introduced April 2009
Olympus E-420 vs Sony HX1 Overview
The following is a complete assessment of the Olympus E-420 vs Sony HX1, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-420 (10MP) and the HX1 (9MP) is fairly close but the E-420 (Four Thirds) and HX1 (1/2.4") posses different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-420 was unveiled 10 months prior to the HX1 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony HX1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-420 scores vs the HX1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-420 vs Sony HX1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-420 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Sony HX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Sony HX1
E-420 | HX1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX1 over the Olympus E-420
HX1 | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2009 | June 2008 | Newer by 10 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Sony HX1
E-420 | HX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus E-420 vs Sony HX1 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera, you need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-420 features physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Sony HX1 has specifications of 115mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 544 grams (1.20 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-420 vs Sony HX1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at the time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-420 versus the HX1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-420 and HX1 is 77 and 67 respectively.
Olympus E-420 vs Sony HX1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions just by looking through specifications. The pic underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-420 and HX1.
To sum up, both of those cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-420 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-420 will render greater detail having an extra 1MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-420 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-420 vs Sony HX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-420 vs Sony HX1 Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-420 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2008-06-23 | 2009-04-22 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.4" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 9MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3456 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-560mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.2 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 9.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1440x1080 |
Video file format | - | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 426 gr (0.94 pounds) | 544 gr (1.20 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 115 x 83 x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $999 | $47,999 |