Olympus E-420 vs Sony HX90V
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
91 Imaging
43 Features
63 Overall
51
Olympus E-420 vs Sony HX90V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released June 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 245g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Launched April 2015
Olympus E-420 vs Sony HX90V Overview
Below, we are comparing the Olympus E-420 versus Sony HX90V, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and HX90V (18MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and HX90V (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-420 was introduced 7 years earlier than the HX90V which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony HX90V being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-420 scores versus the HX90V in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-420 vs Sony HX90V Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-420 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Sony HX90V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Sony HX90V
E-420 | HX90V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX90V over the Olympus E-420
HX90V | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2015 | June 2008 | More modern by 82 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Sony HX90V
E-420 | HX90V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus E-420 vs Sony HX90V Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-420 enjoys external dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Sony HX90V has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-420 versus Sony HX90V in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-420 against the HX90V.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-420 and HX90V is 77 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-420 vs Sony HX90V Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to envision the difference in sensor sizes just by going through specifications. The picture below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-420 and HX90V.
To sum up, the two cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-420 using its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Sony HX90V will show more detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged E-420 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-420 vs Sony HX90V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-420 vs Sony HX90V Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-420 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2008-06-23 | 2015-04-14 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-6.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 638k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.5x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426 grams (0.94 pounds) | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 360 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $999 | $440 |