Olympus E-420 vs Sony HX9V
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
91 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Olympus E-420 vs Sony HX9V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Launched June 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 245g - 105 x 59 x 34mm
- Released July 2011
Olympus E-420 vs Sony HX9V Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-420 vs Sony HX9V, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and HX9V (16MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and HX9V (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-420 was launched 4 years earlier than the HX9V and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony HX9V being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-420 matches up versus the HX9V in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-420 vs Sony HX9V Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-420 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Sony HX9V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Sony HX9V
E-420 | HX9V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX9V over the Olympus E-420
HX9V | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2011 | June 2008 | Fresher by 37 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Sony HX9V
E-420 | HX9V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Olympus E-420 vs Sony HX9V Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-420 features outer dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Sony HX9V has dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-420 vs Sony HX9V in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the E-420 and the HX9V.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-420 and HX9V is 77 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-420 vs Sony HX9V Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizing purely by checking out technical specs. The graphic below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-420 and HX9V.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-420 due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Sony HX9V will provide more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos more aggressively. The older E-420 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-420 vs Sony HX9V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-420 vs Sony HX9V Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-420 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2008-06-23 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | XtraFine LCD display with TruBlack technology |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426g (0.94 pounds) | 245g (0.54 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 105 x 59 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $999 | $328 |