Clicky

Olympus E-420 vs Sony T900

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
36
Overall
40
Olympus E-420 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front
Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
30
Overall
32

Olympus E-420 vs Sony T900 Key Specs

Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Announced June 2008
  • Old Model is Olympus E-410
Sony T900
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
  • 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
  • Revealed February 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-420 vs Sony T900 Overview

Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-420 versus Sony T900, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-420 (10MP) and the T900 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the E-420 (Four Thirds) and T900 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-420 was unveiled 7 months before the T900 and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-420 scores vs the T900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Sony T900

 E-420 T900 

Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus E-420

 T900 E-420 
RevealedFebruary 2009June 2008More modern by 7 months
Screen size3.5"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.8")
Screen resolution922k230kClearer screen (+692k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Sony T900

 E-420 T900 
Focus manually Very accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen

Olympus E-420 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-420 comes with physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Sony T900 has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-420 versus Sony T900 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the E-420 and the T900.

Olympus E-420 vs Sony T900 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-420 and T900 is 77 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-420 vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very hard to see the gap between sensor sizes just by checking technical specs. The picture underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-420 and T900.

As you can tell, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-420 having a bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Sony T900 will give greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-420 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-420 vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-420 vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-420
Portrait photography with Sony T900
56
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
low resolution (10MP)
27
has manual focus
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-420 Street photography info
Sony T900 Street photography info
64
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
lighter than average (426 grams)
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
57
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-420
Sports photography with Sony T900
38
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
max fps very slow (4.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (10MP)
bad battery power (500 per charge)
24
built in image stabilization (Optical)
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,000 seconds)
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-420 Travel photography information
Sony T900 Travel photography information
52
lighter than average (426g)
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse mode
bad battery power (500 CIPA)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
51
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly display
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-420 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony T900 as a Landscape photography camera
47
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is small (2.7")
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (10MP)
bad battery power (500 per charge)
does not have Time Lapse mode
36
has manual focus
bigger than average screen (3.5 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual mode
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
lack of Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-420 as a Vlogging camera
Sony T900 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video recording
28
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not contain selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-420 vs Sony T900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-420 and Sony T900
 Olympus E-420Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-420 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
Class Entry-Level DSLR Ultracompact
Announced 2008-06-23 2009-02-17
Body design Compact SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 35-140mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.5-10.0
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inch 3.5 inch
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 922 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 2 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 4.0 frames per second 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 2.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 426 grams (0.94 lb) 143 grams (0.32 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 527 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photos -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Retail price $999 $300