Olympus E-420 vs Sony T900
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
![Olympus E-420 front Olympus E-420 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Olympus-E-420.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T900/Sony-T900-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Olympus E-420 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced June 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed February 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-420 vs Sony T900 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-420 versus Sony T900, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-420 (10MP) and the T900 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the E-420 (Four Thirds) and T900 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
The E-420 was unveiled 7 months before the T900 and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-420 scores vs the T900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-420 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-420 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-420 Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Sony T900
E-420 | T900 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus E-420
T900 | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2009 | ![]() | June 2008 | More modern by 7 months |
Screen size | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Sony T900
E-420 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus E-420 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-420 comes with physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Sony T900 has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-420 versus Sony T900 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the E-420 and the T900.
![Olympus E-420 vs Sony T900 size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Sony T900 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-420-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T900-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-420 and T900 is 77 and 96 respectively.
![Olympus E-420 vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-420 vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-420-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T900-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus E-420 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to see the gap between sensor sizes just by checking technical specs. The picture underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-420 and T900.
As you can tell, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-420 having a bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Sony T900 will give greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-420 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
![Olympus E-420 vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-E-420-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T900-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus E-420 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus E-420 vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-420 vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-420-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T900-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-420 vs Sony T900 Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-420 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2008-06-23 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-10.0 |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3.5 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 2 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426 grams (0.94 lb) | 143 grams (0.32 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $999 | $300 |