Clicky

Olympus E-420 vs Sony W290

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
36
Overall
40
Olympus E-420 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 front
Portability
94
Imaging
34
Features
28
Overall
31

Olympus E-420 vs Sony W290 Key Specs

Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Released June 2008
  • Old Model is Olympus E-410
Sony W290
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 57 x 23mm
  • Released February 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-420 vs Sony W290 Overview

Following is a extended review of the Olympus E-420 vs Sony W290, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-420 (10MP) and the W290 (12MP) is very comparable but the E-420 (Four Thirds) and W290 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-420 was unveiled 7 months prior to the W290 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony W290 being a Compact camera.

Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-420 grades vs the W290 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Sony W290

 E-420 W290 

Reasons to pick Sony W290 over the Olympus E-420

 W290 E-420 
ReleasedFebruary 2009June 2008More modern by 7 months
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Sony W290

 E-420 W290 
Focus manually More precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch display Absent Touch display

Olympus E-420 vs Sony W290 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry around your camera, you should consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-420 offers physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Sony W290 has sizing of 98mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-420 vs Sony W290 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the E-420 and the W290.

Olympus E-420 vs Sony W290 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-420 and W290 is 77 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-420 vs Sony W290 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Sony W290 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes only by checking out technical specs. The pic below should offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-420 and W290.

As you have seen, both cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-420 with its larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Sony W290 will provide extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-420 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-420 vs Sony W290 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Sony W290 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-420 vs Sony W290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-420 Portrait photography information
Sony W290 Portrait photography information
56
focusing manually
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
MP count low (10 megapixels)
27
manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-420
Street photography with Sony W290
64
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
lighter than average (426 grams)
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
56
image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-420 Sports photography highlights
Sony W290 Sports photography highlights
38
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
max frames per second low (4.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
bad battery life (500 CIPA)
25
image stabilization (Optical)
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-420 Travel photography highlights
Sony W290 Travel photography highlights
52
lighter than average (426g)
flash built-in
missing Timelapse function
bad battery life (500 shots)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
57
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
low megapixels (12MP)
does not have selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.3)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-420 Landscape photography info
Sony W290 Landscape photography info
47
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
bad battery life (500 shots)
missing Timelapse function
41
manual focus
relatively wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
no manual control
low megapixels (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
does not have Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-420
Vlogging with Sony W290
9
no video recording
28
relatively wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
does not have selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external mic jack
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-420 vs Sony W290 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-420 and Sony W290
 Olympus E-420Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-420 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290
Category Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Released 2008-06-23 2009-02-17
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.3-5.2
Macro focus range - 10cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 2 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 4.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.90 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - MPEG-4
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 426g (0.94 lb) 167g (0.37 lb)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 98 x 57 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 527 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 images -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Retail cost $999 $230