Olympus E-420 vs Sony W650
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
96 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
Olympus E-420 vs Sony W650 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced June 2008
- Previous Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
- 124g - 94 x 56 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
Olympus E-420 vs Sony W650 Overview
Below is a complete assessment of the Olympus E-420 vs Sony W650, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and W650 (16MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and W650 (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-420 was announced 4 years prior to the W650 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony W650 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-420 matches up versus the W650 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-420 vs Sony W650 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-420 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Sony W650 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Sony W650
E-420 | W650 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Sony W650 over the Olympus E-420
W650 | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | June 2008 | More recent by 43 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Sony W650
E-420 | W650 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | The same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus E-420 vs Sony W650 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-420 has got outside measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Sony W650 has specifications of 94mm x 56mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-420 vs Sony W650 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the E-420 versus the W650.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-420 and W650 is 77 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-420 vs Sony W650 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements only by looking through technical specs. The visual below will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-420 and W650.
As you have seen, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-420 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Sony W650 will provide you with greater detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots more aggressively. The older E-420 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus E-420 vs Sony W650 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-420 vs Sony W650 Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-420 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2008-06-23 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.6-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | Clear Photo TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 2s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426 grams (0.94 pounds) | 124 grams (0.27 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 94 x 56 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | 220 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD/micro SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $999 | $140 |