Clicky

Olympus E-420 vs Sony A65

Portability
77
Imaging
45
Features
36
Overall
41
Olympus E-420 front
 
Sony SLT-A65 front
Portability
64
Imaging
64
Features
85
Overall
72

Olympus E-420 vs Sony A65 Key Specs

Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Introduced June 2008
  • Superseded the Olympus E-410
Sony A65
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 622g - 132 x 97 x 81mm
  • Introduced November 2011
  • Renewed by Sony A68
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-420 vs Sony A65 Overview

Below is a complete review of the Olympus E-420 and Sony A65, both Entry-Level DSLR cameras by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and A65 (24MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and A65 (APS-C) boast different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-420 was revealed 4 years earlier than the A65 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact SLR).

Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-420 scores vs the A65 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Sony A65

 E-420 A65 

Reasons to pick Sony A65 over the Olympus E-420

 A65 E-420 
IntroducedNovember 2011June 2008More recent by 41 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution921k230kSharper display (+691k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Sony A65

 E-420 A65 
Manual focus Dial exact focus
Touch display Missing Touch display

Olympus E-420 vs Sony A65 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to lug around your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-420 offers outer dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Sony A65 has specifications of 132mm x 97mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") with a weight of 622 grams (1.37 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-420 and Sony A65 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-420 vs the A65.

Olympus E-420 vs Sony A65 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-420 and A65 is 77 and 64 respectively.

Olympus E-420 vs Sony A65 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Sony A65 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be tough to picture the gap in sensor measurements purely by researching specifications. The photograph here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-420 and A65.

Plainly, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-420 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Sony A65 will provide you with more detail because of its extra 14MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older E-420 will be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-420 vs Sony A65 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Sony A65 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-420 vs Sony A65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-420
Portrait photography with Sony A65
57
focusing manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
low megapixels (10MP)
78
focusing manually
MP count decent (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
features face detection focusing
exports RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-420 as a Street photography camera
Sony A65 as a Street photography camera
64
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
lighter than competitors (426g)
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
77
screen articulates
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-420 Sports photography information
Sony A65 Sports photography information
39
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
low battery life (500 shots)
82
image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count decent (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
features tracking autofocus
comes with phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-420 as a Travel photography camera
Sony A65 as a Travel photography camera
53
lighter than competitors (426g)
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse recording
low battery life (500 CIPA)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly screen
68
MP count decent (24 megapixels)
flash built-in
selfie friendly screen
lack of Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-420
Landscape photography with Sony A65
47
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
low battery life (500 per charge)
lack of Time Lapse recording
75
focusing manually
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count decent (24MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-420 as a Vlogging camera
Sony A65 as a Vlogging camera
9
lack of video recording
78
selfie friendly screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
features face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does have external microphone jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-420 vs Sony A65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-420 and Sony A65
 Olympus E-420Sony SLT-A65
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-420 Sony SLT-A65
Type Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2008-06-23 2011-11-15
Body design Compact SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 24MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 6000 x 4000
Maximum native ISO 1600 12800
Maximum boosted ISO - 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 3 15
Cross focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Amount of lenses 45 143
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 921 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 95% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x 0.73x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 4.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 10.00 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 secs 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 426g (0.94 lbs) 622g (1.37 lbs)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 132 x 97 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 56 74
DXO Color Depth score 21.5 23.4
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 12.6
DXO Low light score 527 717
Other
Battery life 500 pictures 560 pictures
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FM500H
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $999 $700