Olympus E-420 vs Sony A68
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0caf0/0caf02c15539c36b2fb3f81379859b5c5d17f544" alt="Olympus E-420 front Olympus E-420 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a332/2a332414d1141ffe894b090011e2d9165f883dd3" alt="Sony SLT-A68 front Sony SLT-A68 front"
64 Imaging
66 Features
70 Overall
67
Olympus E-420 vs Sony A68 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released June 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 610g - 143 x 104 x 81mm
- Introduced November 2015
- Previous Model is Sony A65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Sony A68 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Olympus E-420 and Sony A68, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and A68 (24MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and A68 (APS-C) boast different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-420 was released 8 years before the A68 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact SLR).
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-420 grades versus the A68 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Sony A68 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-420 & Sony SLT-A68. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Sony A68 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Sony A68
E-420 | A68 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A68 over the Olympus E-420
A68 | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2015 | ![]() | June 2008 | Newer by 89 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Sony A68
E-420 | A68 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Same screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus E-420 vs Sony A68 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-420 offers outside measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Sony A68 has proportions of 143mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 610 grams (1.34 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-420 and Sony A68 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-420 versus the A68.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/698af/698af08cd95aa28fb328c394c1b249f8153cffee" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Sony A68 size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Sony A68 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-420 and A68 is 77 and 64 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82e29/82e29dbf97f2d4fb1745ac0aa83858f6ae381c17" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Sony A68 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-420 vs Sony A68 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Sony A68 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions simply by looking at technical specs. The pic below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-420 and A68.
As you can tell, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-420 due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh tougher and the Sony A68 will give greater detail as a result of its extra 14MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged E-420 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35d92/35d927df61ff69a08e598124e8652b9b3f8426d0" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Sony A68 sensor size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Sony A68 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Sony A68 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4bdad/4bdaddad2704954915b8bceab9f822c3cf50776e" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Sony A68 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-420 vs Sony A68 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Sony A68 Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Sony SLT-A68 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-420 | Sony SLT-A68 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2008-06-23 | 2015-11-06 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 24MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 79 |
Cross focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Number of lenses | 45 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 461k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Flash off, Auto, Fill-flash, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Rear sync, Wireless, High Speed sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 30p, 24p), 1440 x 1080, 640 x 480 |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426 gr (0.94 pounds) | 610 gr (1.34 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 143 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | 79 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | 24.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | 13.5 |
DXO Low light score | 527 | 701 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 510 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (Yes (2 or 12 sec)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $999 | $581 |