Olympus E-450 vs Pentax P70
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40


95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Olympus E-450 vs Pentax P70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Launched March 2009
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-110mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 155g - 97 x 54 x 22mm
- Introduced March 2009

Olympus E-450 vs Pentax P70: Battle of the Budget Cameras from 2009
Comparing the Olympus E-450 entry-level DSLR with the Pentax P70 ultracompact camera is a fascinating journey back to 2009 - a year when digital photography was balancing between ever-improving sensor tech and users demanding portability. Both cameras target the budget-conscious crowd, but their approaches couldn’t be more different. As someone who has tested thousands of cameras over 15+ years, including many budget models, I’m here to unravel how these two stack up in real-world scenarios, and crucially, who each serves best.
Let’s dive into the details, starting with the foundational design and ergonomics, before unpacking image quality, autofocus, and suitability for different photography genres. Whether you’re an enthusiastic beginner or a pro looking to understand the tradeoffs of entry-level gear, this deep comparison offers hands-on insights grounded in practical testing.
Size, Feel & Controls: DSLR heft versus pocket convenience
First impressions matter, and the Olympus E-450 shows its DSLR DNA with a chunky yet manageable 130 x 91 x 53 mm body weighing in at 426 grams - not too heavy, but noticeably larger than the Pentax P70’s ultracompact form factor of 97 x 54 x 22 mm at just 155 grams.
For those who prefer a robust grip with clubs for thumbs and fingers, the Olympus feels reassuringly solid. The Pentax, by contrast, fits comfortably in the palm or even some pockets, ideal for casual outings or travel when carrying minimal gear is paramount.
The Olympus’s DSLR heritage shows in its well-laid-out physical dials and buttons - aperture priority, shutter priority modes, and quick access to exposure compensation let you creatively engage rather than rely on full auto. The Pentax, on the other hand, is minimalist with fewer manual controls. No dedicated exposure modes here, which means you’re mostly trusting the camera’s automation - fine if you want uncomplicated point-and-shoot functionality, but limiting for experimentation.
Ergonomics Verdict
- Olympus E-450: Controls suit learners wanting control without overwhelming complexity. A solid DSLR grip helps longer shoots and lenses attach nicely.
- Pentax P70: Ultra portable and discreet but controls are simplified - best for casual snaps or travelers who want light kit without fiddling.
Sensor Showdown: Size matters for image quality
The Olympus E-450 employs a Four Thirds CMOS sensor measuring 17.3 x 13 mm with 10 megapixels of resolution (3648 x 2736 max). Meanwhile, the Pentax P70 is armed with a much smaller 1/2.3" CCD sensor sized at 6.17 x 4.55 mm, boasting 12 megapixels (4000 x 3000 max).
This sensor size discrepancy is huge in the imaging world and explains many differences you’ll see in image quality.
What does sensor size mean in practice?
- Larger sensors capture more light, yielding better dynamic range, less noise especially at higher ISO, and more depth of field control.
- The Olympus’s Four Thirds sensor yields measurable advantages in color depth (21.5 bits vs not tested for Pentax), dynamic range (10.5 stops vs untested), and low-light ISO performance (native max 1600 vs 6400 max ISO but noisier in reality).
- The Pentax, despite more megapixels, suffers from noise more quickly and produces images best suited for small prints or web sharing rather than large crops or professional use.
Image Quality in the Real World: Color, Noise, and Detail
Having put both cameras through rigorous test shoots, here’s what you can expect in daily photography:
- Olympus E-450 photos show richer colors, pleasing skin tones, and greater detail resolution. The noise starts creeping in past ISO 800 but remains manageable.
- Pentax P70 images are sharp in good light but suffer from chirpy noise and loss of color fidelity when shadows deepen or ISO increases - unsurprising given the small CCD sensor and f/2.8-5.0 variable aperture lens.
- Both provide an antialiasing filter to smooth jaggies, but Olympus’s sensor size wins out on finer detail preservation.
Portraits and Bokeh
- The Olympus’s Four Thirds sensor and interchangeable lenses (45 compatible lenses available!) support creamy background blur - especially if paired with fast primes - great for portrait photographers chasing subject isolation and natural skin renditions.
- The Pentax’s smaller sensor and built-in zoom lens deliver a deeper depth of field and less ability to separate subject from background, making portraits less dramatic.
Autofocus: Speed and Accuracy Test
The Olympus’s autofocus system boasts 3 focus points with phase detection (plus contrast detection in live view), offering reasonably quick lock-on for its class. It supports single AF, continuous AF, and multi-area selection, making it flexible for mildly active scenes. Face detection and animal eye autofocus don’t make an appearance here, which is par for the budget DSLRs of that era.
The Pentax relies on contrast detection AF with 9 points but only single AF mode, meaning it can struggle with fast subjects or low-contrast scenes. No AF tracking means sports or wildlife photographers will get frustrated quickly.
Verdict: Olympus offers more dependable autofocus overall, especially in challenging light or when you want precise subject isolation.
Build and Weather Resistance: Can they take a beating?
Neither the Olympus E-450 nor Pentax P70 offers environmental sealing, dustproofing, or waterproofing. The Olympus’s DSLR shell is sturdier feeling and better protected from accidental knocks and light rain, but neither camera is built for heavy-duty outdoor use in extreme conditions.
If you’re shooting landscapes in unpredictable weather or adventurous wildlife photography, you’d want to look beyond these.
LCD Screens and Usability
Both cameras have 2.7-inch fixed LCDs at 230k dots resolution, offering adequate framing and menu navigation. Neither is a touchscreen, and the Olympus includes a more robust live view functionality thanks to the DSLR’s lens interchangeability.
Neither provides an electronic viewfinder, relying instead on an optical pentamirror viewfinder (Olympus) or no viewfinder at all (Pentax). The Olympus offers 95% coverage and 0.46x magnification in the OVF, good enough for composing in bright light without resorting to LCD.
Burst Rates and Buffer Depth: Sports and Action Use Cases
The Olympus E-450 offers a 4 fps continuous shooting rate with buffered JPEG shooting - respectable for an entry DSLR of its generation.
The Pentax P70 does not specify a continuous burst rate; real-world tests indicate it’s best suited for static or slow-moving subjects.
For sports or wildlife, Olympus clearly has the edge.
Lens Flexibility and Compatibility
One huge advantage of the Olympus E-450 is the Micro Four Thirds lens mount, allowing you to swap lenses depending on your needs. Olympus’s lens roster is substantial, including primes, zooms, macro, and telephotos, giving users creative freedom.
The Pentax P70 uses a fixed lens: 28-110mm equivalent with f/2.8-5.0 aperture, adequate for everyday shooting but no way to upgrade optics.
For enthusiasts planning to grow their kit, Olympus’s approach is far superior.
Battery Life and Storage
The Olympus E-450 boasts a healthy 500 shots per charge, which aligns well with typical DSLR usage patterns. It accepts Compact Flash and xD Picture Cards, which were common then but are less popular now.
The Pentax P70’s battery life isn’t rated officially, but the smaller body hints at more modest endurance; it uses SD or SDHC cards, which are more readily accessible today.
If you’re traveling or shooting long events, Olympus’s longer battery life and swappable lenses give you more flexibility.
Video and Multimedia Capabilities
Video was less central in 2009 cameras; neither model excels here.
- Pentax P70 offers basic video recording: 720p at 15fps, which is choppy by modern standards.
- Olympus E-450 offers no video function - strictly a stills-focused DSLR.
- Neither offers microphone or headphone ports, and wireless connectivity is absent in both.
Professionals or enthusiasts wanting solid video features should look elsewhere.
Genre-Specific Performance Breakdown
Let’s summarize how each camera fares across popular photography types:
- Portrait: Olympus wins with better skin tone rendition, bokeh potential, and sharper images.
- Landscape: Olympus’s superior dynamic range and sensor size capture more detail and color gradations.
- Wildlife: Olympus edges out with faster AF and interchangeable telephoto lenses.
- Sports: Olympus for 4 fps burst and better tracking, although neither is ideal for serious sports.
- Street Photography: Pentax P70’s tiny size is a big plus for stealth, but image quality suffers in low light.
- Macro: Olympus with compatible macro lenses beats Pentax’s fixed lens limited closest focus at 10cm.
- Night/Astro: Olympus handles noise better at higher ISO; Pentax struggles beyond base ISO.
- Video: Pentax P70’s 720p video wins by default.
- Travel: Pentax’s compactness suits travel but at cost to image quality and battery life.
- Professional Work: Olympus supports RAW files and more robust workflows; Pentax does not support RAW.
Overall Performance Ratings
In terms of DxOMark-style scoring and our hands-on evaluation, the Olympus E-450 scores higher across the board for color depth, dynamic range, and low-light proficiency. The Pentax P70 comes across as an easy-to-carry compact with decent daylight performance but limited creative flexibility.
Connectivity and Storage Options
Neither camera sports wireless connectivity - no Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC. This was typical in 2009 but a drawback for instant sharing today.
Storage-wise:
- Olympus uses CompactFlash and xD cards, less common today.
- Pentax uses SD/SDHC cards, more standard and accessible.
USB 2.0 connectivity is present on both, with an HDMI output on the Pentax for direct display on TVs.
Price-to-Performance Reality Check
Looking at launch and current used market pricing:
- Olympus E-450 comes in cheaper (~$138), delivering DSLR quality and expandability.
- Pentax P70 (~$200) is pricier but offers ultra portability and zoom versatility.
For strict budget buyers wanting the best image quality and an introduction to interchangeable lens photography, Olympus is the better bang for buck.
Pentax may attract those needing a simple pocket camera with a decent zoom and video.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Olympus E-450 If You:
- Want a capable introductory DSLR with lens options
- Value image quality, dynamic range, and low-light capability
- Aim to explore various creative photography styles (portraits, landscapes, wildlife)
- Can handle a slightly bigger and heavier body
- Shoot RAW and want more manual control
Buy the Pentax P70 If You:
- Need a tiny, carry-anywhere camera
- Prefer straightforward shooting with minimal setup
- Want a built-in zoom lens and basic video functionality
- Are a casual snapshooter or traveler prioritizing portability
- Don't want or need RAW files or extensive manual modes
Final Verdict - The Hands-On Takeaway
The Olympus E-450 still impresses as a 2009 entry-level DSLR that punches above its weight: solid build, decent autofocus, and most critically, a larger sensor coupled with a healthy lens ecosystem. It helps new photographers grow and deliver respectable images, even by today’s modest standards.
The Pentax P70, while not an image quality champ, excels in portability and casual ease of use. It’s more of a digital point-and-shoot with a reasonable zoom and simple interface, no DSLR ambition here. That makes it a great travel companion or a “grab-and-go” camera for cheapskates who’d rather not haul extra lenses around.
For serious enthusiasts or professionals researching gear, I’d recommend prioritizing sensor size, lens flexibility, and manual controls - all of which favor the Olympus E-450 hands down, especially at its lower price point.
Summary Table: Olympus E-450 vs Pentax P70
Feature | Olympus E-450 | Pentax P70 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Size | Four Thirds 17.3 x 13 mm | 1/2.3” 6.17 x 4.55 mm |
Megapixels | 10 | 12 |
Lens Mount | Micro Four Thirds (interchangeable) | Fixed 28–110mm f/2.8-5.0 |
Autofocus Points | 3 (phase detect + contrast) | 9 (contrast detect only) |
Max ISO | 1600 | 6400 (less usable) |
Continuous Shooting | 4 fps | None specified |
Video | None | 720p @ 15fps |
Viewfinder | Optical pentamirror | None |
Weight | 426 g | 155 g |
Battery Life | ~500 shots | Not rated |
Price (used entry-level) | ~$138 | ~$200 |
Photography gear decisions can be tough, especially when weighed against evolving tech and personal priorities. If I were advising a beginner stepping into interchangeable lens cameras or a budget-conscious enthusiast, Olympus E-450 would be my pick for image quality, flexibility, and future growth.
If pocket portability and simplicity are your main criteria - plus basic video - then the Pentax P70 fills that niche admirably.
Hope this thorough hands-on comparison helps direct your next camera purchase with confidence!
Feel free to ask any questions or request sample images - I’m here to assist your photographic journey.
Happy shooting!
End of Article
Olympus E-450 vs Pentax P70 Specifications
Olympus E-450 | Pentax Optio P70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus E-450 | Pentax Optio P70 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2009-03-31 | 2009-03-02 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-110mm (3.9x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 848 x 480 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 426g (0.94 lbs) | 155g (0.34 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 97 x 54 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 512 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $138 | $200 |