Olympus E-450 vs Sony W650
77 Imaging
45 Features
36 Overall
41


96 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
Olympus E-450 vs Sony W650 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced March 2009
- Replaced the Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
- 124g - 94 x 56 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012

Olympus E-450 vs Sony W650 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Olympus E-450 vs Sony W650, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the E-450 (10MP) and W650 (16MP) and the E-450 (Four Thirds) and W650 (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.

The E-450 was revealed 3 years before the W650 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-450 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony W650 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the E-450 scores vs the W650 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus E-450 vs Sony W650 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-450 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-450 Gallery & Sony W650 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-450 over the Sony W650
E-450 | W650 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Sony W650 over the Olympus E-450
W650 | E-450 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2012 | ![]() | March 2009 | More recent by 33 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-450 and Sony W650
E-450 | W650 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus E-450 vs Sony W650 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-450 has outer dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Sony W650 has sizing of 94mm x 56mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
See the Olympus E-450 vs Sony W650 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the E-450 and the W650.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-450 and W650 is 77 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-450 vs Sony W650 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements simply by going through technical specs. The graphic here might give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-450 and W650.
As you can tell, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-450 having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Sony W650 will show extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older E-450 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-450 vs Sony W650 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-450 vs Sony W650 Specifications
Olympus E-450 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-450 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-03-31 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.6-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | Clear Photo TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 2 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426 gr (0.94 lbs) | 124 gr (0.27 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 94 x 56 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 512 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 220 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD/micro SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $138 | $140 |