Olympus E-5 vs Olympus SZ-12
58 Imaging
47 Features
76 Overall
58
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6a95/f6a95b31097a048af622a4616c3ead1c1f5af58e" alt="Olympus E-5 front Olympus E-5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8df78/8df78639e31f6f9cab0cd6bb2ccb49100f8299fb" alt="Olympus SZ-12 front Olympus SZ-12 front"
89 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus SZ-12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 800g - 143 x 117 x 75mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Launched January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus SZ-12 Overview
Here is a in-depth comparison of the Olympus E-5 vs Olympus SZ-12, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both sold by Olympus. The resolution of the E-5 (12MP) and the SZ-12 (14MP) is fairly comparable but the E-5 (Four Thirds) and SZ-12 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-5 was brought out 11 months prior to the SZ-12 so they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-5 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SZ-12 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-5 matches up against the SZ-12 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus SZ-12 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-5 and Olympus SZ-12. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-5 Gallery and Olympus SZ-12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-5 over the Olympus SZ-12
E-5 | SZ-12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-12 over the Olympus E-5
SZ-12 | E-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | ![]() | February 2011 | Fresher by 11 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-5 and Olympus SZ-12
E-5 | SZ-12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurements |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus SZ-12 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-5 offers outer dimensions of 143mm x 117mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") having a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) whilst the Olympus SZ-12 has measurements of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-5 vs Olympus SZ-12 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the E-5 versus the SZ-12.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/199b9/199b90e5486d286e271fe04f6013710275e313b4" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Olympus SZ-12 size comparison Olympus E-5 vs Olympus SZ-12 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-5 and SZ-12 is 58 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6eab7/6eab7d48801b14d5298c96a3c43a2dbaf7d886a9" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Olympus SZ-12 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-5 vs Olympus SZ-12 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus SZ-12 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing only by checking out specs. The graphic below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-5 and SZ-12.
All in all, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-5 because of its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus SZ-12 will show more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics way more aggressively. The older E-5 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4e43/e4e431c5e17b715838b88a233949dea0ba8e3614" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Olympus SZ-12 sensor size comparison Olympus E-5 vs Olympus SZ-12 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus SZ-12 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/107a6/107a62c1c322ff407f0b3c222ade992db8a0ae58" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Olympus SZ-12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-5 vs Olympus SZ-12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus SZ-12 Specifications
Olympus E-5 | Olympus SZ-12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-5 | Olympus SZ-12 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-02-03 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Cross type focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal transmissive LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1700s |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 18.00 m (at ISO 200) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 800 gr (1.76 pounds) | 226 gr (0.50 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 143 x 117 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 519 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 photos | 220 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLM-5 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II)/SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Two | One |
Cost at release | $1,700 | $350 |