Olympus E-5 vs Olympus 9000
58 Imaging
48 Features
76 Overall
59
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 800g - 143 x 117 x 75mm
- Released February 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Other Name is mju 9000
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
In this write-up, we will be looking at the Olympus E-5 and Olympus 9000, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are offered by Olympus. The resolution of the E-5 (12MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is pretty similar but the E-5 (Four Thirds) and 9000 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-5 was announced 21 months later than the 9000 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-5 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-5 scores vs the 9000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-5 & Olympus Stylus 9000. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-5 Gallery & Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-5 over the Olympus 9000
E-5 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2011 | May 2009 | More recent by 21 months | |
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus E-5
9000 | E-5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-5 and Olympus 9000
E-5 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-5 comes with external dimensions of 143mm x 117mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") along with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) and the Olympus 9000 has measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-5 and Olympus 9000 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-5 vs the 9000.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-5 and 9000 is 58 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to envision the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading specs. The visual underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-5 and 9000.
All in all, both of those cameras offer the same exact MP albeit not the same sensor measurements. The E-5 provides the bigger sensor which is going to make achieving bokeh easier. The more recent E-5 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
Olympus E-5 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-5 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
Otherwise known as | - | mju 9000 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2011-02-03 | 2009-05-14 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic V+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Cross focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal transmissive LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 18.00 m (at ISO 200) | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 800 gr (1.76 lbs) | 225 gr (0.50 lbs) |
Dimensions | 143 x 117 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 519 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLM-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II)/SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | 2 | Single |
Pricing at launch | $1,700 | $300 |