Olympus E-5 vs Olympus 8000
58 Imaging
48 Features
76 Overall
59
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus 8000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 800g - 143 x 117 x 75mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Replaced the Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Also referred to as mju Tough 8000
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus 8000 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-5 versus Olympus 8000, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-5 (12MP) and the 8000 (12MP) is fairly similar but the E-5 (Four Thirds) and 8000 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe E-5 was revealed 20 months after the 8000 making them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-5 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-5 grades against the 8000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus 8000 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-5 & Olympus Stylus Tough 8000. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-5 Gallery & Olympus 8000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-5 over the Olympus 8000
E-5 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2011 | July 2009 | More modern by 20 months | |
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Olympus E-5
8000 | E-5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-5 and Olympus 8000
E-5 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus 8000 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-5 provides outer dimensions of 143mm x 117mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") along with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) while the Olympus 8000 has dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-5 versus Olympus 8000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-5 and the 8000.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-5 and 8000 is 58 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus 8000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-5 and 8000.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras feature the identical megapixel count but different sensor sizes. The E-5 uses the larger sensor which will make getting shallower DOF easier. The newer E-5 should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus 8000 Specifications
Olympus E-5 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-5 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 |
Also called | - | mju Tough 8000 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2011-02-03 | 2009-07-01 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic V+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Cross type focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 2cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal transmissive LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 18.00 m (at ISO 200) | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 800 grams (1.76 pounds) | 182 grams (0.40 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 143 x 117 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 519 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLM-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II)/SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | Dual | One |
Pricing at launch | $1,700 | $380 |