Olympus E-5 vs Olympus TG-310
Portability
58 Imaging
48 Features
76 Overall
59
58 Imaging
48 Features
76 Overall
59
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 800g - 143 x 117 x 75mm
- Announced February 2011
- Superseded the Olympus E-3
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-5 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Olympus E-5 and Olympus TG-310, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and both are produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-5 (12MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is fairly well matched but the E-5 (Four Thirds) and TG-310 (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-5 was manufactured within a month of the TG-310 and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-5 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-5 matches up versus the TG-310 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-5 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-5 & Olympus TG-310. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-5 Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-5 over the Olympus TG-310
| E-5 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus E-5
| TG-310 | E-5 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-5 and Olympus TG-310
| E-5 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2011 |  | January 2011 | Similar age |
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-5 enjoys external measurements of 143mm x 117mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) and the Olympus TG-310 has sizing of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-5 and Olympus TG-310 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the E-5 compared to the TG-310.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-5 and TG-310 is 58 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing only by looking at a spec sheet. The visual below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-5 and TG-310.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-5 featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus TG-310 will resolve more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively.
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus E-5 Portrait photography information
Olympus TG-310 Portrait photography information
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focusing
exports RAW formats
MP count low (12MP)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
features face detect focus
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Olympus E-5 Street photography features
Olympus TG-310 Street photography features
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
weather proofing
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
lighter than others in class (155g)
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Olympus E-5 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-310 as a Sports photography camera
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
weather proofing
sensor has phase detect AF
continuous shooting slow (5.0 fps)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14MP)
features tracking focus
environment proofing
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery life (150 per charge)
lack of phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Olympus E-5 Travel photography details
Olympus TG-310 Travel photography details
weather proofing
built-in flash
selfie friendly screen
no Time Lapse function
MP count low (12 megapixels)
lighter than others in class (155 grams)
environment proofing
good megapixels (14MP)
has built in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
bad battery life (150 per charge)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-5 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus TG-310 Landscape photography highlights
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
weather proofing
two card slots
MP count low (12 megapixels)
no Time Lapse function
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
environment proofing
no manual focus
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not available
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
bad battery life (150 shots)
lack of Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Olympus E-5 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-310 as a Vlogging camera
selfie friendly screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detection focusing
includes external mic socket
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focus
lighter than others in class (155 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of mic jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Olympus E-5 | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-5 | Olympus TG-310 |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2011-02-03 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic V+ | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | - |
| Cross focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | HyperCrystal transmissive LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 18.00 m (at ISO 200) | 4.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 800 grams (1.76 lb) | 155 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 143 x 117 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 519 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 870 photos | 150 photos |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLM-5 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II)/SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 2 | One |
| Retail pricing | $1,700 | $0 |